The Game 2023 NRL Match Review Charges & Judiciary

[Bazal]

Luai is a germ but NAS is filth.

The only fair result for the NRL is both banned for life

 

[League Unlimited News]

Titans v Warriors​

Moeaki Fotuaika (Gold Coast)

• Grade 2 Careless High Tackle
• 17th minute, on Charnze Nicoll-Klokstad
• Base penalty 2 matches
• His options:
  2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR 1 match: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

Panthers v Storm​

Jarome Luai (Penrith)

• Grade 1 Careless High Tackle
• 47th minute, on Nelson Asofa-Solomona
• Base penalty $1500
• 3rd+ offence last 12 months
• His options:
  2 matches: Guilty at judiciary or plea of no contest
  OR $3000: Guilty - early plea
• PLEA: TBC

NRL Match Review & Judiciary Charges: Round 23 & NRLW Round 3 » League Unlimited

leagueunlimited.com

 

[SLRBRONCOS]

Lol at the judiciary, scared of being knifed by the eshay

 

[Danish]

Looks like Nathan Brown has a guaranteed downgrade then using the Luai charge as a precedent

 

[Canard]

Holmes 3 weeks?

Luai $3k fine.

The NRL need to check there bias.

 

[Suitman]

It is worse than the 2 send-offs.

 

[King-Gutho94]

Seems like getting sent off gets you a lesser suspension then getting sin binned.

Surely if it's send off worthy you are looking at 3+ weeks on the sideline.

Otherwise its not really harsh enough to be sent off.

 

[Canard]

I've said many times, but you do have to admire how the NRL just don't give a f**k about playing favourites.

 

[Saxon]

Luai fine? F*cking joke.

 

[Ring Gids]

Seems like getting sent off gets you a lesser suspension then getting sin binned.

Surely if it's send off worthy you are looking at 3+ weeks on the sideline.

Otherwise its not really harsh enough to be sent off.

On the flip side, if the refs miss a blatant incident, the MRC doesn’t want to draw further attention the refs incompetence

 

[Desert Qlder]

Warriors sponsor was right about the refs and system broadly, that’s why it hit a nerve.

 

[skeepe]

Luai better enjoy it while he can, as soon as he wears another jersey those fines will become suspensions.

And it wasn’t careless, it was deliberate.

 

[Saxon]

On the flip side, if the refs miss a blatant incident, the MRC doesn’t want to draw further attention the refs incompetence

Sad but true.
Hence Luai gets to skate.

 

[skeepe]

Just watched it again. It’s not even a tackle, it’s a shoulder charge.

Careless high tackle, seriously. What were they smoking?

 

[Pete Cash]

Does the nrl just think bigger players can't get concussed or something

 

[SLRBRONCOS]

One of the most clearly deliberate shoulder charges (and to the head) for the season - stays on field - small fine.

The NRL continues to be the most pathetically administered league in world sport.

At least he collected NAS though.

 

[Pjf04b]

In the run of play nobody even saw it. It was innocuous with no impact hence the charge. Even the ref looked bemused when the bunker told him to put Luai on report.
Nelson's late collision with Cleary was more forceful and got what it deserved - a penalty.

 

[skeepe]

In the run of play nobody even saw it. It was innocuous with no impact hence the charge. Even the ref looked bemused when the bunker told him to put Luai on report.
Nelson's late collision with Cleary was more forceful and got what it deserved - a penalty.

No impact? NAS dropped the ball and had to leave the field as a result.

Try to engage your brain before posting

 

[Canard]

In the run of play nobody even saw it. It was innocuous with no impact hence the charge. Even the ref looked bemused when the bunker told him to put Luai on report.
Nelson's late collision with Cleary was more forceful and got what it deserved - a penalty.

"The ref missed it", probably isn't the best excuse.

 

[Apey]

Does the nrl just think bigger players can't get concussed or something

They 100% have a big man vs small man loading.