Well we don't know if they agreed with that partWell they are all getting paid the same so money is no longer a determinant! NZ are the ones getting short end of stick as players are unlikely to opt for them and wreck their origin chances.
Another reason why I truly despise origin.Well they are all getting paid the same so money is no longer a determinant! NZ are the ones getting short end of stick as players are unlikely to opt for them and wreck their origin chances.
Island teams will be getting the short end of the stick when nz names there Nz A teamWell they are all getting paid the same so money is no longer a determinant! NZ are the ones getting short end of stick as players are unlikely to opt for them and wreck their origin chances.
Not really.Island teams will be getting the short end of the stick when nz names there Nz A team
Should, but with Fiji in the lesser Plate tournament he may want to step up to a Cup nation.He played for Fiji in last year’s World Cup so he should stick with them.
And if that happens it justifies people calling international RL eligibility rules Mickey Mouse.Should, but with Fiji in the lesser Plate tournament he may want to step up to a Cup nation.
They are designed for it.And if that happens it justifies people calling international RL eligibility rules Mickey Mouse.
It’s one thing to switch from Fiji to New Zealand but to switch from Fiji to another tier2 nation like Tonga is beyond a joke.They are designed for it.
He can play for NZ and move back to Fiji/Samoa/Tonga and back again. It would be silly to assume some won’t do that, no matter that it isn’t what we would necessarily want
How is it beyond a joke lol your switching countries no matter the status. It's been done before so I see no harm in itIt’s one thing to switch from Fiji to New Zealand but to switch from Fiji to another tier2 nation like Tonga is beyond a joke.
it’s like musical chairs.
Because it’s international sport and not domestic.How is it beyond a joke lol your switching countries no matter the status. It's been done before so I see no harm in it
The international game needs to gow first before that happens. If they change the rule now we'll be back to just 3 nations fight for the top spot.If we are going to finally see a more consistent int calendar Id be happy to see a 2 year fixed term for players national nominations. it does the sport no favours to see a player in a Samoa jersey one year and a Kangaroos or Kiwis one the following year. Make them pick and stick for two years.
Not necessarily. If players are now paid same and there is equal games for every nation each year there is no reason to pick Australia or NZ over the other nations. Other than the elephant in the room that is Origin in Australia's case or course.The international game needs to gow first before that happens. If they change the rule now we'll be back to just 3 nations fight for the top spot.
No one wants to go back to that
i agree but you shouldn’t be allowed to switch between tier2 nations.The current rules now is why the international games better than ever
This will never be 100% righti agree but you shouldn’t be allowed to switch between tier2 nations.
Not necessarily, the PMs 13 is an invitational side, not an Int rep side. It has no impact on eligibility for test places.With the hammer being named in the Australian PMXIII squad does this mean he’s not playing for Samoa in the tri-nations competition?