JubileeJeffro
Juniors
- Messages
- 837
If we could also get Metcalfe homesick now the warriors are struggling that could be very good. Halves partner of Kyle in junior sharks system. Then perhaps a Brailey or Crossland out of Newcastle
luciano or angus at 13 yes pleaseWhy? Expecting Su'A to resign now and with Luc/RFM we dont need more starting edge forwards. Angus linked to a move back to the bunnies is good news for us.
Props please.
I've been giving a lot of thought to Toby or Ryan as our lock ongoing, not sure which.. and not sure if 2025 Round 1 is the start.....Maybe we use both of them (1 off the bench). Based on guys like Murray & Cotter, lock seems like a position more tolerant of their smaller body weights, and they have tonnes of energy/speed.we already have enough blokes in reserves who have never played 1st grade at lock without overpaying on someone from outside to do that.
I think Sexton will get an extension if he can keep that up for a few games.. I think next week we will see more of what Kyle is capable of without Hunt, however he does seem a bit too robotic.. but also its hard to compare our attack when you see the shape that the dogs threw at us.. and we dont actually have shape.. we play a power game with big boys bashing running hard, edge to edge... we also have a fullback who really only threatens in open space so he isnt going to break tackles himself and open space doesnt always come, so our ability to score points is very unpredictable.. i.e. there isnt a natural conversion of field position into points... its why things dry right up for us at times.Not too sure how it can continue to be argued that Sexton isn't a better half than Kyle Flanagan. Same style in that they are controlling halves, and Sexton is better. We are not signing a marquee half for next season, so we should upgrade where we can. Sexton is an upgrade and is off contract. Owned both Hunt and Flano last night. When I saw he'd come into the team for Hutch, I was worried
I agree, but im frustrated cause those 2 key injuries were the reason for them looking so good (and the ref didnt help), we were leading at halftime.. and I was rly hoping we could bash them in the 2nd.. but I also knew once JDB and Eisenhuth had to do extra work, their errors and missed tackles would be there unless we dominated possession.. which we really didnt. Losing a centre on top just handed them the win.Last night the Dogs would have had a chuckle seeing KFlanno and RFM play like they did. Saints are a laughing stock at the moment.
The simple truth of it is Kyle Flanagan isn't good enough. Sure, he's admirable in filling a gap in our team, and will continue to do admirable things here and there during games throughout the course of the season. The thing that is worrying to me though, is fans seem to be planning for Kyle as if he's a walk up half in this team for the next 2,3, 4 years. He's not, he isn't good enough. The talk about him being a 14 is perplexing to me as well. He provides no impact, no variation, no speed to a game. He's not a 14. I'm fine for Kyle to be at the club, but the vision for him should be that he's playing reserve grade at either hooker or half and that is where he stays until there is injury/suspension/origin. He is no more than an admirable back up, and I feel that fans are losing sight of this reality. He is not an answer, he's a stop gapI think Sexton will get an extension if he can keep that up for a few games.. I think next week we will see more of what Kyle is capable of without Hunt, however he does seem a bit too robotic.. but also its hard to compare our attack when you see the shape that the dogs threw at us.. and we dont actually have shape.. we play a power game with big boys bashing running hard, edge to edge... we also have a fullback who really only threatens in open space so he isnt going to break tackles himself and open space doesnt always come, so our ability to score points is very unpredictable.. i.e. there isnt a natural conversion of field position into points... its why things dry right up for us at times.
Kyle struggles to cover centre also so perhaps not the ideal 14 either, I suppose he covers 6/7/9 which is something, but we need an agile back rower to cover centre, maybe one of the couchmans could do it....
One of your best Parko.The simple truth of it is Kyle Flanagan isn't good enough. Sure, he's admirable in filling a gap in our team, and will continue to do admirable things here and there during games throughout the course of the season. The thing that is worrying to me though, is fans seem to be planning for Kyle as if he's a walk up half in this team for the next 2,3, 4 years. He's not, he isn't good enough. The talk about him being a 14 is perplexing to me as well. He provides no impact, no variation, no speed to a game. He's not a 14. I'm fine for Kyle to be at the club, but the vision for him should be that he's playing reserve grade at either hooker or half and that is where he stays until there is injury/suspension/origin. He is no more than an admirable back up, and I feel that fans are losing sight of this reality. He is not an answer, he's a stop gap
Still believe this. The long term goal should be Kyle as back up. We're tracking well, yesterday was a great win, but lets not get carried away either. We and the team need to enjoy the win, but also they need to not pat themselves on the back too much (which they have done in the past) or we will get beat badly at brooky. I want to see us win comps. My belief remains that Kyle is admirable and at times will do a good job for us. But I also believe we need better if we want to be in the business of winning premierships. I'm not content with competing for the 8. For now I am because that is realistic. Longer term, we need better in my view. Kyle isn't top tier.One of your best Parko.
Total crap, but you're entitled to your opinion
and that is fair enoughStill believe this. The long term goal should be Kyle as back up. We're tracking well, yesterday was a great win, but lets not get carried away either. We and the team need to enjoy the win, but also they need to not pat themselves on the back too much (which they have done in the past) or we will get beat badly at brooky. I want to see us win comps. My belief remains that Kyle is admirable and at times will do a good job for us. But I also believe we need better if we want to be in the business of winning premierships. I'm not content with competing for the 8. For now I am because that is realistic. Longer term, we need better in my view. Kyle isn't top tier.
The halves are the most important positions though. You need class there. Last four grand final teams' halves pairings: Luai/Cleary x4, Munster/Hughes, Walker/Reynolds, Brown/Moses, Mam/Reynolds. Flano just isn't in that calibre. He's going well, I like Kyle don't get me wrong, but I want to see us go to another level. In terms of game management, I certainly wouldn't call him great. Kicking is an important aspect of game management. Even with Marchske in the team, Kyle didn't do much kicking. Anyway, lets enjoy the win and focus on a challenge against Manly next week. Very important game for usand that is fair enough
My view is the cap doesn't allow for premium, gold class, player in every position
KF's skill is his ability to bring every one of our players strengths into our attack and his defence is awesome. He also posses great game management skills.
You can see our forwards love to run off Kyle
That's gold!