JJ
Immortal
- Messages
- 32,762
But why is nobody talking about the critical #8 role?Can't say the opinion of an Englishman worries me much, to be fair.
The days of an entire top 7 averaging 50 are long gone. We make do with what we have
But why is nobody talking about the critical #8 role?Can't say the opinion of an Englishman worries me much, to be fair.
The days of an entire top 7 averaging 50 are long gone. We make do with what we have
And Nathan Lyon is arguably your 3rd best Test batsman and has been for years.Cummins looks technically better than most of the top order.
Everyone that you think is good enough - Head, Paine, Burns - is absolutely not.
I can only assume that you're peak trolling by sticking up for these donkeys.
Serious question... is Labuschange more Smith or more Voges?
lots of guys have stellar 12 mths, have people gotten carried away?
Almost like for every run he’s scored he’s had luck...He’s been our top run scorer this match, just ahead of Wade, and a scrambling 47 in our first innings in Adelaide, only Paine was superior. The Indian bowling in Adelaide was impeccable in the first innings, and impeccable here in Melbourne both innings. Even more impressive given Shami is out..
India have been on top for the majority of both tests but their batting calamity has masked issues with our batting.
My concern isn’t with Labuschagne, and I think he’s a genuine long term batsman.
We’ve just been found out without Warner and our usually “bankable” runs from Smith. No other batsman can be considered certainties moving forward apart from Lab.
Off topic, but Australian cricket related...the tour to South Africa now looks unlikely according to the Brisbane Times.
Yep - he is a positivity troll.
Off topic, but Australian cricket related...the tour to South Africa now looks unlikely according to the Brisbane Times.
Usual thing I reckon. He came from the clouds and bowlers didn't know much about him. Now he's been analysed they've come up with plans to reduce his favourite scoring zones and so make him take more risks if he wants to score.Almost like for every run he’s scored he’s had luck...
not saying he’s the problem, just questioning whether he might be more like his first class record in reality
That sounds totally high Octane!!!!Cricket Australia would prefer to watch AJ Tye bowl to a 14 year old talentless Victorian called Macalister or McKenzie 8 months out of the year than try and develop a good Test batsman.