I'm not sure but they were talking about it yesterday, didnt quite catch it.. I'd say a related injury though.why not?
For once in his life Nicholas makes a decent point. The fact that he is captain probably makes it less likely he'll get 400. If someone else was captain I doubt they'd declare until he got out or got 400. But because it's his decision I could see him declaring so he doesn't look bad.
Personally I'd be happy for us to keep batting until he gets 400. We have enough time, and the more we bat the more tired their ancient batsmen get and the less likely they'll put up a serious resistance. But I reckon he'll declare around tea sadly.
He only posts in the cricket forum when we are losing.I'm not sure but they were talking about it yesterday, didnt quite catch it.. I'd say a related injury though.
That's what I've been thinking and a lot of people are missing this point.The good thing is the Australian batsmen can tire the Indian fielders while the bowlers are sitting comfortably having a couple of days rest. When Australia declare, the bowlers will be refreshed and the Indian batsmen will be lethargic and exhausted.
That's what I've been thinking and a lot of people are missing this point.
We battled all of yesterday, if we bat most of today that's 2 hot long days we've made them field. Sehwag, Tendulkar, Dravid and Laxman are all in their mid to late 30s.
They're all probably buggered, we tire them out even more and they won't have the strength to bat for 2 days after fielding for 2 days.
I say declare at 4.30pm.
Bit of a debate but the commentators are saying they heard Clarke say to Hussey via the stump mike "If you've got 200 (or 300) in you I'll stay with you".