BunniesMan
Immortal
- Messages
- 33,738
Finally the breakthrough. And it's the machine: Pattinson. Well caught by Hughes too. Could be just the thing to give him some confidence.
Maybe it's not the pitch? Maybe the batsmen have been dissapointing? Go through all the 22 wickets that have fallen so far. Maybe 3 or 4 have been because of the wicket? There is nothing wrong with that. The vast majority of wickets have been because of poor batting.A pitch that gets a result inside of three days (like this test match might) is NOT a good pitch.
It is better than a road of a pitch but is still not a good pitch.
Maybe it's not the pitch? Maybe the batsmen have been dissapointing? Go through all the 22 wickets that have fallen so far. Maybe 3 or 4 have been because of the wicket? There is nothing wrong with that. The vast majority of wickets have been because of poor batting.
If a Kiwi lower order bloke can get a 50, it isnt THAT bad.
A pitch that gets a result inside of three days (like this test match might) is NOT a good pitch.
It is better than a road of a pitch but is still not a good pitch.
Disagree.
Batsman have no idea how to play in difficult conditions and the vast majority of wickets have shown this. Not many wickets have fallen to crazy deliveries.
4 or 5 wickets have fallen to players leaving or attempting to leave the balls in good lines. Most of the other top order batsman have been caught playing too defensive - Guptill x2, McCullum, Hughes, Khawaja
Brownlie, Siddle, Clarke showed that you can be dominant on the wicket without being stupid like Haddin or being overly defensive as long as you play your shots and don't worry about what the pitch might do.
Test cricket.
Not gonna agree. Clarke played and missed two balls earlier and the one that bowled him was hardly a ridiculous ball. Ponting yes. Not many others.
A handful of balls kept down, meh. Too many predictable pitches this green top is great