Yep. Both would have been not out on review if given that way on field. Great stuff from hazelwoodusually Aus have been unlucky with the umps call
two lucky ones todat
Ironically, although he sucks as a spinner he scored 2 tons in India which is probably more than any of your batsmen will score over there.Let's not forget Adil Rashid and the sheer brilliance of Moeen Ali....
Smith a ton a testIronically, although he sucks as a spinner he scored 2 tons in India which is probably more than any of your batsmen will score over there.
Impressive. What was the series result?Ironically, although he sucks as a spinner he scored 2 tons in India which is probably more than any of your batsmen will score over there.
Ironically, although he sucks as a spinner he scored 2 tons in India which is probably more than any of your batsmen will score over there.
The last time Lyon and O'Keefe both played for Australia in the same game/conditions was in Sri Lanka. Lyon took 5 wickets. O'Keefe took 3. O'Keefe might be better than Lyon but he has no real credentials to prove it. If he totally outplays him next week, he might. But right now he's not better and you can't drop a bloke unless there's an option that is better. You can't even say he's untried because he's not. He's only played three tests but they were three different opportunities to make a statement and he didn't really do it. Even Lyon made the most of his chance when he was first picked.
Got the stats to back that up? "Whenever" - good luck proving that.Stuart MacGill had the happy knack of taking more wickets whenever he and Warne were in the same team. he must be better than Warne.
The last time Lyon and O'Keefe both played for Australia in the same game/conditions was in Sri Lanka. Lyon took 5 wickets. O'Keefe took 3. O'Keefe might be better than Lyon but he has no real credentials to prove it. If he totally outplays him next week, he might. But right now he's not better and you can't drop a bloke unless there's an option that is better. You can't even say he's untried because he's not. He's only played three tests but they were three different opportunities to make a statement and he didn't really do it. Even Lyon made the most of his chance when he was first picked.
Macgill was world class. It's well documented he is an absolute dickhead of a bloke so the fact he got picked so many times in a team famous for its cameraderie speaks volumes about his ability as a bowler.Stuart MacGill had the happy knack of taking more wickets whenever he and Warne were in the same team. he must be better than Warne.
Lost 4 nil in a 5 test series.Impressive. What was the series result?
Anyone who has watched much cricket will remember Magilla often took more wickets that Warne...he also normally went for approximately double the runs. It's not some great revelation.Got the stats to back that up? "Whenever" - good luck proving that.
Hahahaha Warne you sad pathetic merkin.
Commentary off and music back on for me