He's been due for about 3 years.Amla reprieved and due a big score
Lol yeah because only Strayans get bans LOLIntentional, and should cop a ban. But he's not Australian, so I'm certain he will get off.
Michael Holding summed up Amla well in the last test.He's been due for about 3 years.
You squeal like a stuck pig whenever an Australian looks at an opposition player the wrong way. Does it go the other way, i wonder? Should Rabada cop a ban?Lol yeah because only Strayans get bans LOL
Not for that, IMO nothing there, but he has form and like some others needs to grow upYou squeal like a stuck pig whenever an Australian looks at an opposition player the wrong way. Does it go the other way, i wonder? Should Rabada cop a ban?
I know this test is still very early but we may have stuffed up the toss.
All the commentators said at the time, they thought it was bowl 1st pitch. De Plesis said he was leaning towards bowling too.
Happy to be proven wrong.
Not for that, IMO nothing there, but he has form and like some others needs to grow up
Sure, I don't think there was much in it but happy if he's suspendedRabada will get suspended, I haven't seen a good angle but you can't give the batsman a piece of your shoulder after you've dismissed him
Rabada will get suspended, I haven't seen a good angle but you can't give the batsman a piece of your shoulder after you've dismissed him
The difference is their previous history.Sure, I don't think there was much in it but happy if he's suspended
Of course I also thought Warner should have been
It was, Warner was an embarrassment to cricketThe difference is their previous history.
Warner was charged with a grade 3 and accepted. Apparently Rabada has been charged with a grade 2.
So that says the officials think Warner incident was worse
Yeah not sure whether i agree or not.It was, Warner was an embarrassment to cricket
Hostile? LolDeliberate and hostile physical contact is worse than some shouting.
Not even arguable.