Disagree, seemed to be gaps... is what it is, Vihari will be disappointed but theme the breaks... at best ambiguous I'm pretty certain he didn't hit itReally? I thought it was clearly enough to uphold the onfield call. Ball was very close to the edge, and there was a spike.
Being between the frames is not the same as being totally off camera.
This - although it surprises me the framerate being used is so poor.Really? I thought it was clearly enough to uphold the onfield call. Ball was very close to the edge, and there was a spike.
Being between the frames is not the same as being totally off camera.
Disagree, seemed to be gaps... is what it is, Vihari will be disappointed but theme the breaks... at best ambiguous I'm pretty certain he didn't hit it
Agreed... Pujara's conversion rate of turning double-hundreds to quadruple-hundreds is poor... Such a failure of a cricketer...Your best bet is to attack Pujara's partners and leave Pujara to get 200. Once he gets past 200, he's vulnerable.
Imagine being a 12 year old and fielding for 5 days.......Listening to ABC Grandstand, Ed Cowan lamenting the lack of red ball cricket being played in junior national championships... And they read out a stat about Pujara, when aged 12, scored a 300+ not out from 500-odd balls in a junior Indian tournament....
Agreed... Pujara's conversion rate of turning double-hundreds to quadruple-hundreds is poor... Such a failure of a cricketer...
Agreed... Pujara's conversion rate of turning double-hundreds to quadruple-hundreds is poor... Such a failure of a cricketer...
It was definately out. Just can't take trick.
If they show it again - which they probably won't, but take note of the rotation of the seam as it approaches the bat and as it leaves the bat. Big change.I don't know what the noise was, but that one I don't think Pant nicked it. There was a little daylight between bat and ball, and no deflection. Nothing seemingly on hotspot for the few frames before it became useless.