Bazal
Post Whore
- Messages
- 103,820
Nah - Bazal said his SR is fantastical. He can hit 90+
Did I? Again, I presume you can quote me...
Sabermetrics indicate you're making shit up again
Nah - Bazal said his SR is fantastical. He can hit 90+
they will groom Carey
ton of time and ODI to get him there before the wc
Lyon will be there as well. As well as either short or lynn maybe both
Did I? Again, I presume you can quote me...
Sabermetrics indicate you're making shit up again
I'd have Paine in my test team no fears but his strike rate and ability to score quickly to boost innings in the shorter formats negates his keeping skills.
If he's going to be in the team he needs to bat top 4 IMO. He's the kind of batsman we lack in the middle overs who anchors the innings, they all want to pongo everything when the best way to score in the middle overs is to rotate the strike and take toll of the bad balls. You don't need to be going mental all the time
He can strike just fine when he's on but he's more of a classical bat and more useful in the middle overs IMO.
Your sabermetricals don't lie.
You sabermetrically defined his peak 90+ sr (well above his career) as all good. Do you really want me to quote?
Run the sabermetricals again. Match your previous result.
Cos Ill just google your handle with 90.![]()
Yeah - but so will England A.
Straya - you gots to sort your team balances g
other than stokes, England have had their top squad this series, they have shown their best
Its their wc squad
we will get better, our w/c squad will look different
Smith played so poorly all series, I guess that can happen after giving his all in the ashes
Except they were missing The Mighty Chris Woakes, Bradman of the number 8 position and World XI superstar.
It's a miracle win that will go down in the annals of history
A 90+ SR is fine. Of course I said that, because it's true. If you disagree with that then that's your own stupidity
Why don't you sabermetrically go f**k yourself?
If anyone is being sabermetrically f**ked - its your cricket team. But you don't appreciate this with your Hiney 'pick the 4 best bowlers'.
What does someone else's opinion gave to do with me?
Is this like you picking a random Aussie and having a crack at them about tennis jokes they never made? Is it dementia? It's dementia, isn't it?
Not dimentia.
Hiney and I disagreed over the number 8 role, and you and Always Green et al involved yourselves.
Hiney thought his eyesight should persuade me more than calculations. I disagreed and have suffered insults.
So now, you, Always Green and Hiney are fair game. Deal with it.
Lol. I involved myself in your overly high opinion of The Might Chris Woakes you pelican. That doesn't mean I share the opinion of someone else other than the fact that both of us think you're a complete moron. Sabermetrically.
Well I'm glad you think sabermetrics is useful for something, now. Unfortunately for you, Sabermetrics is not an IQ test. So you kinda missed the boat on that one. Buit if you try really hard, prepare, have a really good day, and get spoon fed some answers, I believe that you may crack three figures on your next IQ test.
This is honestly what happens when you play all your players in all the forms, Warner looks burnt out, same as Smith should of given them a rest after the Test series.
1. Finch
2. S Marsh
3. Khawaja
4. Head
5. Maxwell
6. Stoinis
7. Carey
8. Starc (3 out of 5)
9. Jye Richardson
10. Billy Stanlake
11. Lyon or Swepson
Obviously injuries killed Finch and Uzzie, but that team would of given it a better crack.
Is that your opinion, or are you confusing it with some unrelated opinion?
It is my my opinion, but it would be shared by anyone who knows what sabermetrics and/or IQ tests are.