Dogs Of War said:I was just reading one of your articles... http://www.rl1908.com/History/crossbar.htm
And I was wondering what you thought of AFL really being a cross of Rugby and Soccer rules. The no offside rule like in soccer (well you know what I mean when I say no offside rule, no structure like rugby). Even the marking up on the field from that picture of the game, suggests that rugby and soccer both had a similar influence on AFL. Seems they just borrowed rules from both games to create there own.
I think the real answer lies in English folk football. The off-side rules of Rugby School seem to me to be the first attempts to limit the free movement of players that existed in folk football and the first school football in the early 1800s. In that sense, Aust rules (Melb FC 1859), by leaving out all the Rugby School's off-side rules, opted for a more primitive form of football...which is what a lot of their founders say ie. that they wanted a game that was simple to understand. Even today, if you read the Rugby School rules of 1845 they are difficult to quickly understand, particularly in regard to off-side play. (None of this changes my view about the 1858 match being under Rugby School laws).
The unrestricted movement of off-side players and punching the ball in today's AFL is there in the Rugby School rules of 1845.
Rugby School rules 1845. The Melbourne FC laws were written in 1859. The FA (soccer) was 1863. The RFU was 1871. The VFA (Victorian FA) was 1877.
Aust rules claims it is older than soccer (FA 1863) and RFU (1871) as its rules were codified in 1859 at the Melb FC. Yet, there were "football" clubs in England before 1859 who went on to form part of the FA's soccer and RFU's rugby clubs. To me, you have to compare like with like - the first time that football clubs in Melbourne formed a collective body per the FA and RFU was in 1877 under the VFA.
My biggest gripe with Aust football is that it tends to look at its history in isolation. The other codes have (because of the competition between the codes) been aware of each other's development and history, and can see/accept/recognise the commonalities and shared history.