Frank_Grimes
First Grade
- Messages
- 7,023
Please explain to me how a precedent being set at the judiciary isn't relevant?
You know what precedents are and how they work in determining future rulings, yes?
What you are suggesting is that because an injustice was done to a player in the past, it should be done to all in the future, yes?
Consistency for consistency's sake as someone else put it?