Is that why there was a 4-1 penalty count in Parra's favour at half time?
I'm mainly referring to the entire first half.Every single decision went Melbourne's way.
Slater lost the ball because of Fui's leg grab. Thus the penalty.
Disagree. Apart from that one shocker, I thought Eels got more leeway.
The only thing I didn't like was the play the ball speed during the first half. Parra were forced to move a hell of a lot quicker after making a tackle compared to Melbourne.
That Fui Fui decision reminded me of the grand final in 2009 when Greg Inglis got taken out in the first half right in front of the try line yet no penalty was given.
Parramatta had plenty of opportunities to win the game, you can't blame the loss on one decision, regardless of how important it seemed....
Sound familiar Storm fans?
the interference wasn't on the ball, the interference was for the second leg grab when the player was trying to stand up after the tackle.There is no way in the world there was interference with the ball, that call which everybody saw even in normal speed handed the game to the Storm.
Hmmm, lets ignore the fact that the Storm were by far the better team...