But we won't tell if you don't.
He's not filming them, he's filming the general area. There is no privacy in a public place. If you are in public, you waive the right to privacy.
Plus i think indecent exposure is a criminal offence. So he's just gathering "evidence" to prepare for the police.
Depends, he only said it is viewable from his office complex. He could be looking into a house or unit complex, which is private property.
Ah, true. Then he is an architecture enthusiast, taking a photo of the, uh, window ledges and shit.
or a terrorist looking for potential targets.
Or a pervent, filming half naked Women in a public place...
I would have thought that would have been the most obvious answer.
Don't you mean to add, only if we get copies of the pictures??But we won't tell if you don't.
Strangest looking "twin towers" I've ever seen...
He would fly a plane into those towers if you know what I'm saying
Mis, I think you're making a mistake going to the French restuarnt. You're esentially telling the lady you don't give a f**k about her and to prove it, you're going to feed here snails and frogs because you don't think she's good enough to deserve human food.
Go the Italian man.
Think Ferrari's and their fiesty women. All that cliched Italian passion.
*Anti-French bias included in post. Please take into consideration
Don't you mean to add, only if we get copies of the pictures??
Technically its the filming of voyeuristic porn, which is an invasion of privacy. Technically.
Don't worry dad, I'm on the pill.
He wants me to go watch him race his car...