El Diablo
Post Whore
- Messages
- 94,107
lockyno1 said:Oh wow he has 2 centuries in 2 years! Jeez he must be a world-beater!:lol:
how many does Symonds have?
lockyno1 said:Oh wow he has 2 centuries in 2 years! Jeez he must be a world-beater!:lol:
lockyno1 said:I wonder how Wonderboy feels! Failing twice against the Bangers!:lol:
Mighty Tiger said:Who has the lowest score for the Aussies in this test match?
El Diablo said:how many does Symonds have?
lockyno1 said:Clarke! He'll get in this morning and p..s off as quickly as he came to the crease!:lol:
lockyno1 said:Symonds wasn't give 2 years to make some scores!![]()
El Diablo said:Clarke scored one in his first test innings
guess what Symonds got in his first test innings?
lockyno1 said:Who cares, Clarke is only in the side because he is marketable! And here is something for you....
Dizzy averages 24.65 from his last 16 Tests with a century and two fifties.
Michael Clarke averages 25.09, with two fifties and no hundreds from the same period.
Oh Dear, oh dear! Wonderboy is truely s..t!:lol:
El Diablo said:what does Symonds average?
lockyno1 said:Oh wow he has 2 centuries in 2 years! Jeez he must be a world-beater!:lol:
lockyno1 said:Who cares, isn't Clarke a batsman:roll:
lockyno1 said:Who cares, isn't Clarke a batsman:roll:
Mighty Tiger said:To be considered an all rounder doesn't this require a player to be also considered a bowler and a batsman?
Twizzle said:the are no NSW selectors, so how can it ?
lockyno1 said:Symonds was a reasonable player but that is not the point. He is not in the side.
El Diablo said:but you think he should be
fish eel said:If Andrew Symonds performed, the selectors would have had no need to even think about a recall for clarke