- Messages
- 28,154
Nothing wrong with his weight, he was one of the top scores this season.
aussies1st said:Nothing wrong with his weight, he was one of the top scores this season.
Not at test level...lockyno1 said:Lehmann seemed to do ok with his weight!;-)
GoTheBears said:Not at test level...
Cosgrove could well be a top player in the future, but Clarke will no doubt be up there
waltzing Meninga said:Dizzy is a far more competent all rounder than Symonds. He always seems to be able to survive 100 balls or more just when the team needs him to.
Dizzy would obviously be a bowling all rounder, but his bowling is leaps and bounds ahead of Symonds and his batting is better too IMO. Far more likely to stick around in a pressure situation
lockyno1 said:The way this is going he is a good bet to score more runs than Wonderboy in this test!:lol:
waltzing Meninga said:Only because we will probably declare before he gets a bat
waltzing Meninga said:Michael Clarke test career
Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St
21 1100 151 35.48 2 4 8 6/9 9.37 1 18 0
Andrew Symonds test career
Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St
10 286 72 19.06 0 2 9 3/50 45.44 0 10 0
He is twice as good as symonds locky
lockyno1 said:What is your point? Symonds is not playing!
waltzing Meninga said:You continue to demand Andrew Symonds selection, yet you critisise someone who is proven to be twice as good as him.
waltzing Meninga said:Ponting runs himself out again. Has one player been involved in as many run outs as him in the history of the game???
lockyno1 said:The Waugh brothers?
waltzing Meninga said:Steve was pretty bad, but I don't think as Bad as Ponting. He would have an average of over 60 if he didnt get run out so often