What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bangers vs Aussies - 2nd Test

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,150
aussies1st said:
Nothing wrong with his weight, he was one of the top scores this season.

Bingo! If weight was one critieria the one and only WARNE would have hardly played a test!:shock:
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,150
GoTheBears said:
Not at test level...
Cosgrove could well be a top player in the future, but Clarke will no doubt be up there

Um...

class mat inns no runs hs ave bf sr 100 50 4s 6s ct st
Tests
27 42 2 1798 177 44.95 2909 61.80 5 10 214 10 11 0

Yep, shocking record there! That is 10 runs more than Clarke FFS!:shock: As for Clarke being up there, unless he changes his approach he won't be!
 
Messages
2,984
Dizzy is a far more competent all rounder than Symonds. He always seems to be able to survive 100 balls or more just when the team needs him to.

Dizzy would obviously be a bowling all rounder, but his bowling is leaps and bounds ahead of Symonds and his batting is better too IMO. Far more likely to stick around in a pressure situation
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,150
waltzing Meninga said:
Dizzy is a far more competent all rounder than Symonds. He always seems to be able to survive 100 balls or more just when the team needs him to.

Dizzy would obviously be a bowling all rounder, but his bowling is leaps and bounds ahead of Symonds and his batting is better too IMO. Far more likely to stick around in a pressure situation

The way this is going he is a good bet to score more runs than Wonderboy in this test!:lol:
 

Twizzle

Administrator
Staff member
Messages
151,895
2 for 197 at drinks, scores level

12 overs in the first hour, pathetic
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,150
waltzing Meninga said:
Only because we will probably declare before he gets a bat

Haha...if wonderboy bats you might as well just put a extra wicket next to rafique's figures! He'll be out as quickly as he walks to the crease!:lol:
 
Messages
2,984
Michael Clarke test career

Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St

21 1100 151 35.48 2 4 8 6/9 9.37 1 18 0

Andrew Symonds test career

Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St

10 286 72 19.06 0 2 9 3/50 45.44 0 10 0

He is twice as good as symonds locky
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,150
waltzing Meninga said:
Michael Clarke test career

Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St

21 1100 151 35.48 2 4 8 6/9 9.37 1 18 0

Andrew Symonds test career

Mat Runs HS BatAv 100 50 W BB BowlAv 5w Ct St

10 286 72 19.06 0 2 9 3/50 45.44 0 10 0

He is twice as good as symonds locky

What is your point? Symonds is not playing!
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,150
waltzing Meninga said:
You continue to demand Andrew Symonds selection, yet you critisise someone who is proven to be twice as good as him.

Well he sure is better value than Clarke. But that said I would have Cosgrove in there. Honestly Clarke might get you 20 but that is about it as his shot selection is abysmal!

Punter run out by the way! Terrible call!:evil:
 

lockyno1

Post Whore
Messages
53,150
waltzing Meninga said:
Steve was pretty bad, but I don't think as Bad as Ponting. He would have an average of over 60 if he didnt get run out so often

Them batting together was a recipe for disaster!:(
 

Latest posts

Top