What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Bret Stewart >Josh Dugan & Hayne

Garts

Bench
Messages
4,360
I could not give a toss if Stewart gets back into the rep scene. He probably won't, even if he gets back to his best. I will be over the moon if he does get back to his best or close to it as he is one of the most potent try scorers in the games history.

At the end of the day there is a bees dick between all the fullbacks discussed in this thread.
 

Eels Dude

Coach
Messages
19,065
There is a lot of Dugan love going on, but you can't blame Canberra fans as he's the best prospect (Carney aside) they've had come through the grades since the early 90's. He'll play rep footy at some point but he's going to have to contend with another great young player the same age as him in Lachlan Coote. Which of these two young players will become the better player only time will tell.

Out of all the first choice fullbacks for clubs in the NRL the fact that nearly half of them (Stewart, Hayne, Slater, Minichiello, Gidley, Boyd, Bowen) have played for Australia is astonishing. It makes it hard to weigh out the best, and puts a question mark as to how long players like Coote and Dugan will have to wait before making their rep debuts.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
89,606
He has more try saves than all of them because he is physically bigger and stronger and is good at getting under the ball close to the line. There are plenty of examples of Hayne arriving late and being exploited like v Roosters this year.

So all fullbacks have their weaknesses. They've got their strengths too. Yet the haters play up Hayne's weaknesses and ignore his strengths.

Tall poppy syndrome mate. I was the same back when my team had no superstars; why should Raiders or Dragons fans be any different?

Positioning is partly to do with experience, it also has to do with attitude and application. Josh Dugan has played less first grade games than Hayne but is rarely caught out of position.

Experience doesn't start when you get to first grade though. Dugan's been a fullback all his life; Hayne played his juniors (and half his first grade career) all across the backline and even at lock.

It's a fashionable myth to criticise Hayne for being lazy or lacking awareness or courage but when you look at his involvement (runs, metres, etc) you can't call him lazy, when you see some of the passes he throws you can't criticise his awareness, and his try saves (and some of his hits back when he defended in the line) are testament to his courage.

The reason you notice Hayne when he's beaten to a kick is because he's Jarryd Hayne. The camera's constantly on him, and the commentators can't shut up about him.

It's called 'aura'. Few players have it.

Slater is the best at it, almost always gets the ball on the full and with all his momentum moving forward.

Yet Hayne averages more metres per kick return.

Don't forget as well, that Slater has been dropped as QLD fullback twice in the middle of a series. He also played poorly in a Wrld Cp final. Back when he first made the transition from centre to fullback for the Storm he was constantly criticised for his mistakes.

It wasn't until the haters got sick of Hayne that they started talking up Slater's positioning and defence.

Try saves aren't a positional statistic.

If you're not there you don't save the try mate.

Compare to Billy Slater who is almost always there on time regardless of whether his effort is successful or not. Plenty of times when Hayne is caught infield and doesn't get across. It is a criticism of Hayne that I have heard from top coaches and respected opinions.

Just like the praise, Hayne's criticism is overdone. It comes from being a once-in-a-generation player.

Slater is more involved in his team than Hayne, if not based on how many times he grabs the ball, then by how many times he is sitting back running the plays. One area that Slater is a long way ahead of Hayne and any other fullback in.

Some games it seems like Hayne is the only player at Parramatta. He went from hitting gaps all last year to making 17 linebreak assists this year. Hayne plays fullback and halfback (a reason Parra went so poorly this year) while Slater injects himself only when he needs to, because Smith and Cronk (and Finch) run the show.

How the hell can you say Slater runs the plays at Melbourne when they have a future immortal at dummy-half, an Australian international at halfback and a former Origin halfback at five-eighth.

Slater talks on the field like any senior player, as does Hayne.

Dugan can make the odd unforced error but he is already one of the main men in his side and that is without any origin experience.

Every fullback in the NRL is one of the key players in their respective teams. It's the nature of the position.

So you have two examples ALL year of being good under the high ball.

No I have two examples of him returning a bomb for a long break. That's not good, that's incredible. Most players surrender in the tackle after taking a bomb.

Dugan is probably the safest under the high ball, you don't see him drop many.

All players have their strengths.

Hayne has won awards on the wing yes but hardly an indicator on his ability at fullback

He's won the Dally M Medal from fullback. The awards from the wing just show his ability to influence a game regardless of where he plays.

To be king you have to be the best. Slater is the best.

If he was the best he'd also be the most high profile. There's a lot of hype around Slater but there's far more around Hayne. That's because Billy Slater at his best is not as good as Jarryd Hayne at his best, and having the luxury of less responsibility at stronger teams (Melbourne, QLD) allows him to play at a more consistent level.

He has a mortgage on all rep jerseys and Hayne is no threat to take his jerseys.

The only jersey they're competing for is the Australian jersey, and as they say, it's harder to get out of the Australian team than it is to get in.

Slater has the luxury of playing at club or Origin level with half the Australian backline and playmaking corps. Hayne's one the few Australian internationals at Parramatta and the only Blues player who would make the QLD Origin team: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/greats-praise-honorary-queenslander-hayne-20090628-d0oo.html

Hayne's so good they pick him out of position in the Australian side, at the expense of quality wingers.

That's because regardless of whether or not he's the best fullback in the game, Hayne is the best player: http://www.smh.com.au/news/lhqnews/phil-gould/2009/08/22/1250362254874.html

Lockyer isn't the player he was and his overall stats are rarely near the top but when the game is on the line give me Lockyer over Hayne even now.

When the game is on the line? How about when the season is on the line. Is Lockyer going to give you 6 consecutive Man-of-the-Match performances, making the entire rest of the NRL look like under 7s? Hayne mightn't have repeated his heroics this year but he's still been one of the best players in the comp. And Lockyer's never had to carry his team the way Hayne's had to. Why do you think Parra's freed up half a milion bucks for a playmaker?

The CC medal is awarded by the same people who pick the rep sides, not journalists and media "experts" like the Dally M. So it isn't a media driven award.

No but it is driven by politics, just like the Australian team always was. Given the Aussie team has no real competition (apart from 2008 when they were red-hot favourites) selectors can play favourites without it coming back to bite them on the arse - the fourth or fifth string Australian side is better on paper than the Kiwis or Poms. Only Benji Marshall would walk in to the Australian side. All the other great Kiwis play for Australia anyway (Hunt, Folau).

Yes but Slater is still the undisputed no.1 regardless of the Storm drama.

I put it to you that it is very disputed.

Slater was disputed as the best right up until Hunt signed with the AFL. Then for 2008 Slater was the undisputed best. Then last year saw the rise of Hayne and the title of best fullback has been in dispute ever since.

Hayne's attacking ability is only rivaled by Carney, Marshall and Thurston - and Hayne has them all beat for speed and power. His specific quality as a fullback is only rivalled by Slater and Dugan - neither of whom are the number 1 attacking option at their clubs.

He still managed to be the rep player of the year.

It was always going to be a Queenslander.

This is the same idiotic argument about C Smith. They are elite players in the game regardless of the Storm drama

I never disputed that. The fact that the Storm were so far over the salary cap is proof of the quality of the individual players. But it's also proof that all of those players have better on-field support by virtue of the players around them. Meaning their performances (particularly consistency) should be be taken with a grain of salt when judged against other players in less star-studded teams.

Slater has been playing a lot longer and is more experienced yes, another reason why Hayne is not king.

But experience isn't all there is. Aside from experience I think Hayne has Slater covered in every area - speed, power, vision, ball skills. And I concede Slater is an absolute freak. But Hayne is a once-in-a-generation talent that inspires fear and jealousy in opposition fans.

Slater has been surrounded by superstars yes but that is also a weak argument I hear a lot on here.

Why is it a weak argument?

Surely you concede of those superstars Slater is among the biggest and best. Gary Belcher, Graeme Langlands, Garry Jack, Darren Lockyer etc all surrounded by superstars throughout their careers, no one denies their talents.

Sure, and it can also be argued that it's easier to stand out in a poor side - look at Paul Gallen.

The difference is, people don't talk about Gallen the way they talk about Hayne. Chris Close hates anybody who wears a sky blue jersey and even he couldn't help recognise Hayne's quality:

Chris Close said:
As far as courage and commitment go, Queensland are spot on.

That's the difference between the sides.

Big Steve Price and Petero Civoniceva, you looked at their beaten bodies and they were saying, 'No', but their hearts were saying, 'Yeah, let's go, boys'. And they just kept going. They dug deep and filled those burning lungs with oxygen and took those extra couple of steps to make those tackles that really counted. And that is so Queensland-like.

The only bloke on the other side who played with close to that much passion was Jarryd Hayne.

Hayne was wonderful all series. He tried his guts out the whole game. He's one of few blokes in that team who played with an Origin spirit. He didn't give up.

People don't like Slater because he is a bit of a grub but in reality he is the best fullback since Darren Lockyer was at the back imo.

He might be the best at specifically defensive fullback play but more and more we see fullback becoming an attacking position (see Carney at the start of the year and Preston Campbell at the end - even Hayne plays fullback for his attack).

Just like halfbacks, they're celebrated for their attacking ability. Slater won the Clive Churchill Medal last year for scoring a try despite playing poorly in defence - he dropped a bomb under little pressure, Reddy scored from another bomb, and Slater was ineffective in preventing both Moimoi and Grothe from scoring despite "being there".
 

MSIH

Bench
Messages
3,807
ld
I could not give a toss if Stewart gets back into the rep scene. He probably won't, even if he gets back to his best. I will be over the moon if he does get back to his best or close to it as he is one of the most potent try scorers in the games history.

At the end of the day there is a bees dick between all the fullbacks discussed in this thread.

Couldn't agree more.

That said, people saying that Dugan currently is better than Stewart at is peak is outrageous.
 

MSIH

Bench
Messages
3,807
So all fullbacks have their weaknesses. They've got their strengths too. Yet the haters play up Hayne's weaknesses and ignore his strengths.

Tall poppy syndrome mate. I was the same back when my team had no superstars; why should Raiders or Dragons fans be any different?



Experience doesn't start when you get to first grade though. Dugan's been a fullback all his life; Hayne played his juniors (and half his first grade career) all across the backline and even at lock.

It's a fashionable myth to criticise Hayne for being lazy or lacking awareness or courage but when you look at his involvement (runs, metres, etc) you can't call him lazy, when you see some of the passes he throws you can't criticise his awareness, and his try saves (and some of his hits back when he defended in the line) are testament to his courage.

The reason you notice Hayne when he's beaten to a kick is because he's Jarryd Hayne. The camera's constantly on him, and the commentators can't shut up about him.

It's called 'aura'. Few players have it.



Yet Hayne averages more metres per kick return.

Don't forget as well, that Slater has been dropped as QLD fullback twice in the middle of a series. He also played poorly in a Wrld Cp final. Back when he first made the transition from centre to fullback for the Storm he was constantly criticised for his mistakes.

It wasn't until the haters got sick of Hayne that they started talking up Slater's positioning and defence.



If you're not there you don't save the try mate.



Just like the praise, Hayne's criticism is overdone. It comes from being a once-in-a-generation player.



Some games it seems like Hayne is the only player at Parramatta. He went from hitting gaps all last year to making 17 linebreak assists this year. Hayne plays fullback and halfback (a reason Parra went so poorly this year) while Slater injects himself only when he needs to, because Smith and Cronk (and Finch) run the show.

How the hell can you say Slater runs the plays at Melbourne when they have a future immortal at dummy-half, an Australian international at halfback and a former Origin halfback at five-eighth.

Slater talks on the field like any senior player, as does Hayne.



Every fullback in the NRL is one of the key players in their respective teams. It's the nature of the position.



No I have two examples of him returning a bomb for a long break. That's not good, that's incredible. Most players surrender in the tackle after taking a bomb.



All players have their strengths.



He's won the Dally M Medal from fullback. The awards from the wing just show his ability to influence a game regardless of where he plays.



If he was the best he'd also be the most high profile. There's a lot of hype around Slater but there's far more around Hayne. That's because Billy Slater at his best is not as good as Jarryd Hayne at his best, and having the luxury of less responsibility at stronger teams (Melbourne, QLD) allows him to play at a more consistent level.



The only jersey they're competing for is the Australian jersey, and as they say, it's harder to get out of the Australian team than it is to get in.

Slater has the luxury of playing at club or Origin level with half the Australian backline and playmaking corps. Hayne's one the few Australian internationals at Parramatta and the only Blues player who would make the QLD Origin team: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/greats-praise-honorary-queenslander-hayne-20090628-d0oo.html

Hayne's so good they pick him out of position in the Australian side, at the expense of quality wingers.

That's because regardless of whether or not he's the best fullback in the game, Hayne is the best player: http://www.smh.com.au/news/lhqnews/phil-gould/2009/08/22/1250362254874.html



When the game is on the line? How about when the season is on the line. Is Lockyer going to give you 6 consecutive Man-of-the-Match performances, making the entire rest of the NRL look like under 7s? Hayne mightn't have repeated his heroics this year but he's still been one of the best players in the comp. And Lockyer's never had to carry his team the way Hayne's had to. Why do you think Parra's freed up half a milion bucks for a playmaker?



No but it is driven by politics, just like the Australian team always was. Given the Aussie team has no real competition (apart from 2008 when they were red-hot favourites) selectors can play favourites without it coming back to bite them on the arse - the fourth or fifth string Australian side is better on paper than the Kiwis or Poms. Only Benji Marshall would walk in to the Australian side. All the other great Kiwis play for Australia anyway (Hunt, Folau).



I put it to you that it is very disputed.

Slater was disputed as the best right up until Hunt signed with the AFL. Then for 2008 Slater was the undisputed best. Then last year saw the rise of Hayne and the title of best fullback has been in dispute ever since.

Hayne's attacking ability is only rivaled by Carney, Marshall and Thurston - and Hayne has them all beat for speed and power. His specific quality as a fullback is only rivalled by Slater and Dugan - neither of whom are the number 1 attacking option at their clubs.



It was always going to be a Queenslander.



I never disputed that. The fact that the Storm were so far over the salary cap is proof of the quality of the individual players. But it's also proof that all of those players have better on-field support by virtue of the players around them. Meaning their performances (particularly consistency) should be be taken with a grain of salt when judged against other players in less star-studded teams.



But experience isn't all there is. Aside from experience I think Hayne has Slater covered in every area - speed, power, vision, ball skills. And I concede Slater is an absolute freak. But Hayne is a once-in-a-generation talent that inspires fear and jealousy in opposition fans.



Why is it a weak argument?



Sure, and it can also be argued that it's easier to stand out in a poor side - look at Paul Gallen.

The difference is, people don't talk about Gallen the way they talk about Hayne. Chris Close hates anybody who wears a sky blue jersey and even he couldn't help recognise Hayne's quality:





He might be the best at specifically defensive fullback play but more and more we see fullback becoming an attacking position (see Carney at the start of the year and Preston Campbell at the end - even Hayne plays fullback for his attack).

Just like halfbacks, they're celebrated for their attacking ability. Slater won the Clive Churchill Medal last year for scoring a try despite playing poorly in defence - he dropped a bomb under little pressure, Reddy scored from another bomb, and Slater was ineffective in preventing both Moimoi and Grothe from scoring despite "being there".

Gimp alert.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
89,606
At the end of the day there is a bees dick between all the fullbacks discussed in this thread.

You're kidding right?

The only reason you're talking about them in the same breath as Hayne is because Hayne happens to play fullback.

Hayne's the only fullback in the game who is able to do it all on his own. He's the only one comparable to Lockyer and Fittler at their best.
 

Garts

Bench
Messages
4,360
Not kidding. Hayne definitely is a freakish talent but he does not perform every week to this level and is a little inconsistent but that might change with more experience. Like I said overall it's a bees dick between them all.
 

Wrong_Number

Juniors
Messages
29
If Lockyer was still playing fullback, he would have been the best ever.
Of the current crop Slater is miles ahead of anyone.
Slater Daylight Hayne/Boyd/Dugan.
The one to look out for is Hoffman from the Broncos.
Give him the off season in the gym.
Stewart when he was fit was just below Slater, but Slater has since lifted his game to another level.
 

Poupou Escobar

Post Whore
Messages
89,606
Stewart when he was fit was just below Slater, but Slater has since lifted his game to another level.

All I see is a lot of missed tackles and errors. Ordinary kick return metres.

He's a pretty good secondary playmaker though and until last year he made a lot of line-breaks. I guess he's slowing down in his old age.
 

sarahk

Juniors
Messages
778
Bobby DIGital - attacks the person not the argument

Thats what him and RaidersNOTpremiers do. They dont know how to argue against someone who actually says something constructive so they attack others with insults such as 'you are a tool' in order to appear somewhat intelligent.

Poupou, i agree with everything you said before. The fact of the matter is that if Hayne played for Raiders they would be jizzing over him so bad that we'd never hear the end of it. Hayne is the most naturally talented player out of all the fullbacks, and i'd only rate Slater as being nearly up there with him. Slater is just lucky he plays behind the pack he does.
 

simmo1

First Grade
Messages
5,447
Hayne, once in a generation player, give me a f**king break. Come back when he's performed at his peak for a few more than a handful of weeks a season.
 

typicalfan

Coach
Messages
15,478
So all fullbacks have their weaknesses. They've got their strengths too. Yet the haters play up Hayne's weaknesses and ignore his strengths.

Tall poppy syndrome mate. I was the same back when my team had no superstars; why should Raiders or Dragons fans be any different?



Experience doesn't start when you get to first grade though. Dugan's been a fullback all his life; Hayne played his juniors (and half his first grade career) all across the backline and even at lock.

It's a fashionable myth to criticise Hayne for being lazy or lacking awareness or courage but when you look at his involvement (runs, metres, etc) you can't call him lazy, when you see some of the passes he throws you can't criticise his awareness, and his try saves (and some of his hits back when he defended in the line) are testament to his courage.

The reason you notice Hayne when he's beaten to a kick is because he's Jarryd Hayne. The camera's constantly on him, and the commentators can't shut up about him.

It's called 'aura'. Few players have it.



Yet Hayne averages more metres per kick return.

Don't forget as well, that Slater has been dropped as QLD fullback twice in the middle of a series. He also played poorly in a Wrld Cp final. Back when he first made the transition from centre to fullback for the Storm he was constantly criticised for his mistakes.

It wasn't until the haters got sick of Hayne that they started talking up Slater's positioning and defence.



If you're not there you don't save the try mate.



Just like the praise, Hayne's criticism is overdone. It comes from being a once-in-a-generation player.



Some games it seems like Hayne is the only player at Parramatta. He went from hitting gaps all last year to making 17 linebreak assists this year. Hayne plays fullback and halfback (a reason Parra went so poorly this year) while Slater injects himself only when he needs to, because Smith and Cronk (and Finch) run the show.

How the hell can you say Slater runs the plays at Melbourne when they have a future immortal at dummy-half, an Australian international at halfback and a former Origin halfback at five-eighth.

Slater talks on the field like any senior player, as does Hayne.



Every fullback in the NRL is one of the key players in their respective teams. It's the nature of the position.



No I have two examples of him returning a bomb for a long break. That's not good, that's incredible. Most players surrender in the tackle after taking a bomb.



All players have their strengths.



He's won the Dally M Medal from fullback. The awards from the wing just show his ability to influence a game regardless of where he plays.



If he was the best he'd also be the most high profile. There's a lot of hype around Slater but there's far more around Hayne. That's because Billy Slater at his best is not as good as Jarryd Hayne at his best, and having the luxury of less responsibility at stronger teams (Melbourne, QLD) allows him to play at a more consistent level.



The only jersey they're competing for is the Australian jersey, and as they say, it's harder to get out of the Australian team than it is to get in.

Slater has the luxury of playing at club or Origin level with half the Australian backline and playmaking corps. Hayne's one the few Australian internationals at Parramatta and the only Blues player who would make the QLD Origin team: http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/sport/greats-praise-honorary-queenslander-hayne-20090628-d0oo.html

Hayne's so good they pick him out of position in the Australian side, at the expense of quality wingers.

That's because regardless of whether or not he's the best fullback in the game, Hayne is the best player: http://www.smh.com.au/news/lhqnews/phil-gould/2009/08/22/1250362254874.html



When the game is on the line? How about when the season is on the line. Is Lockyer going to give you 6 consecutive Man-of-the-Match performances, making the entire rest of the NRL look like under 7s? Hayne mightn't have repeated his heroics this year but he's still been one of the best players in the comp. And Lockyer's never had to carry his team the way Hayne's had to. Why do you think Parra's freed up half a milion bucks for a playmaker?



No but it is driven by politics, just like the Australian team always was. Given the Aussie team has no real competition (apart from 2008 when they were red-hot favourites) selectors can play favourites without it coming back to bite them on the arse - the fourth or fifth string Australian side is better on paper than the Kiwis or Poms. Only Benji Marshall would walk in to the Australian side. All the other great Kiwis play for Australia anyway (Hunt, Folau).



I put it to you that it is very disputed.

Slater was disputed as the best right up until Hunt signed with the AFL. Then for 2008 Slater was the undisputed best. Then last year saw the rise of Hayne and the title of best fullback has been in dispute ever since.

Hayne's attacking ability is only rivaled by Carney, Marshall and Thurston - and Hayne has them all beat for speed and power. His specific quality as a fullback is only rivalled by Slater and Dugan - neither of whom are the number 1 attacking option at their clubs.



It was always going to be a Queenslander.



I never disputed that. The fact that the Storm were so far over the salary cap is proof of the quality of the individual players. But it's also proof that all of those players have better on-field support by virtue of the players around them. Meaning their performances (particularly consistency) should be be taken with a grain of salt when judged against other players in less star-studded teams.



But experience isn't all there is. Aside from experience I think Hayne has Slater covered in every area - speed, power, vision, ball skills. And I concede Slater is an absolute freak. But Hayne is a once-in-a-generation talent that inspires fear and jealousy in opposition fans.



Why is it a weak argument?



Sure, and it can also be argued that it's easier to stand out in a poor side - look at Paul Gallen.

The difference is, people don't talk about Gallen the way they talk about Hayne. Chris Close hates anybody who wears a sky blue jersey and even he couldn't help recognise Hayne's quality:





He might be the best at specifically defensive fullback play but more and more we see fullback becoming an attacking position (see Carney at the start of the year and Preston Campbell at the end - even Hayne plays fullback for his attack).

Just like halfbacks, they're celebrated for their attacking ability. Slater won the Clive Churchill Medal last year for scoring a try despite playing poorly in defence - he dropped a bomb under little pressure, Reddy scored from another bomb, and Slater was ineffective in preventing both Moimoi and Grothe from scoring despite "being there".


I don't remember ignoring the strengths of Hayne, he is big, powerful, strong in defense and has a great attacking game. He can also be slow to react at the back, caught out of position and a little inconsistent. I don't notice this because he "is Jarryd Hayne" I know this because I watch footy and make the effort to compare players abilities in this area.

No tall poppys here mate, not even close.

Yes Dugan has been a fullback for a long time and that may be why some of these areas come naturally whereas Hayne needs to work on them a little more.

I have never said Hayne lacks courage or commitment, Slater had bucket loads of it when he held up Watmough, Dugan had bucket loads of it when he tackled a runaway Dave Taylor, it is not an area Hayne has more or less of than other fullbacks. He can be a bit lazy in his positional play, doesn't mean he is a lazy footballer in general, sometimes it is more a lack of concentration than laziness.

I notice Jarryd Hayne is out of position because the kick goes in and I go "why the hell is he way over there?" or "where is he?" Not because I am a harsh marker. Rabs loves him for sure but he loved Brett Mullins back in the day as well, I don't remember many "where the hell is he?" questions about Mullins.

I have been talking up Slaters positioning since the start of 2008. Truth is Slater has gone to another level since he monumental stuff up in the WC final.

Lets remember that most people would rate Hayne in the top 2-4 fullbacks in the nrl and would concede as a pure footballer he is about as talented as they get. But he does have weaknesses, big ones. He is young and should develop more as his career unravels but is he king fullback now? no way.

Slater took a long time to get where he is. He had the pure athleticism that Hayne has now, but he was prone to many errors and was rocks or diamonds. He did it tough but as of this moment he is safely no.1 in the game. At Melbourne Slater does more organising than Smith, Cronk or Finch. Melbourne are probably the best team to watch live to see how often he is pointing and pulling players around. He is starting to have the same effect in SOO. Smith used to do a lot of the organising but lets Cronk do more now and Finch barely did any, he sat back on the other side of the ruck and called for the ball when he saw something.

Remember the try v Dragons this year, that is a set play called by Slater, whenever you see him just behind the ruck about to inject himself he is always calling the play.

But being good under the high ball doesn't necessarily talk about the line break that follows. Slater is a little scratchy under the high ball, not his strongest asset but guys like Dugan and Stewart are so natural.

Carney, Marshall and Thurston are all closer to the action Hayne didn't work out at 6.

Again Dally M medal is judged by journalists and media "experts".

Most high profile doesn't mean best, that is silly to even argue. For starters Hayne plays for Parramatta, a huge club with a thirst for success, highly unstable. Eels fans love their club until it hurts. Slater on the other hand has to dodge the tumble weeds in Melbourne, about the only things that recognise him there. I hate to break it to you but outside of Sydney Hayne's profile ain't that much different to Slater's. The best players thrive under pressure not the other way around.

Billy Slater is the Australian fullback because....he is the best all round fullback.

Slater is one of the main figureheads in all the teams he plays for, he isn't a passenger, he is one of the guys driving the vehicle. QLD also said Alan Tongue would be an origin player if he were a maroon. Even if Hayne broke into the team it wouldnt be at fullback.

Hayne gets picked on the wing in rep teams because he is a very good rep winger. Simple.

I wouldnt have Hayne at no.1. I wouldn't have him in the top 5. And I respect players like Hindmarsh at his club more than him.

Hayne had an incredible run of consecutive matches but in my world greatness comes from being able to be great for years, not weeks. Lockyer has pulled the cat out of the bag at the highest levels for years and still one of the best players going around. I can't believe you think these guys are on some level playing field. Hayne does what he did in 2009 for the next 6-7 years, then yes lets talk. Are you saying Lockyer hasn't had some decent coin in his time at the Broncos?

Oh ok so you are suggesting favouritism toward Slater? lol

The salary cap doesn't prove that Slater himself had better games than he was entitled to. It was the ability of the Slater's, Smith's, Inglis's that caused a rise in some of the lesser players worth not the other way around.

Slater plays with more intensity, better positionally, has consistently over a long time come up with the big play. No fear or jealousy here mate, Hayne has incredible skills but delivering them on the big stage is what Rugby League is all about. Hayne did that for a few finals but Slater has been doing it for years at all levels.

It can be easier to stand out in a poor side but on the flip side a poor side can bring your ability and confidence down. But to argue good or bad sides based on how a player "looks" to be playing is a bit like not watching the game and just checking the stats.

The fullback today needs to fill both attacking and defensive roles. But in attack a fullback has it a bit easier than a 6 or 7 because they are often wider and thus have less defensive pressure. On the other hand a player like Carney found it tough positionally in defense and now he is in the front line again. You have to be good at both. Slater is great at both. Hayne is great in attack and good but could be better in defence.

I don't know about you but the best play Hayne did all year was his trysaving tackle on Stagg. For Slater his trysaving tackle on Watmough and for Dugan his try v Rabbitohs.

A fullback might get wraps for his attack but defence is still top priority.
 

typicalfan

Coach
Messages
15,478
Thats what him and RaidersNOTpremiers do. They dont know how to argue against someone who actually says something constructive so they attack others with insults such as 'you are a tool' in order to appear somewhat intelligent.

Poupou, i agree with everything you said before. The fact of the matter is that if Hayne played for Raiders they would be jizzing over him so bad that we'd never hear the end of it. Hayne is the most naturally talented player out of all the fullbacks, and i'd only rate Slater as being nearly up there with him. Slater is just lucky he plays behind the pack he does.
I don't see what makes Eels and Raiders supporters any different in this example. I mean the commentators "jizz" all over Hayne and I think everyone recognises his talent but I think Eels fans are going a bit far saying Slater is lucky while Hayne is talented.
 

Wrong_Number

Juniors
Messages
29
If you had a choice of playing any fullback from the past decade in tomorrow's decider, Lockyer would be my choice easily.
Then it'll be a toss up between Minichiello and Slater.
To even mention Hayne in Lockyer's class is an insult and this is coming from NSW supporter.
 
Top