Brett Stewart found not guilty of sexual assault

[1999]

since stewart has admitted he cant remember the night then any witness statement is gonna be gold, even if the witness is the victims father, not lookin good for stewart if the father testifies, they must have some solid evidence too if he has to stand trial.. not good..

 

[GB!]

he'd be sh*tting himself now

why?
if he knows he's innocent, why would he be shi**ing himself?

 

[Mr Saab]

why?
if he knows he's innocent, why would he be shi**ing himself?

But if he was absolutely sloshed...and it is alleged he was, then he might not recall 100% with what happened.

 

[Fein]

why?
if he knows he's innocent, why would he be shi**ing himself?

You may have answered your own question!!

 

[El Diablo]

why?
if he knows he's innocent, why would he be shi**ing himself?

because i 'd wager he would have been hoping it didn't go to trial as that's one step closer to the big house

Laffranchi and Crockett never had to go to trial

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/04/23/2225038.htm?site=news

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/11/21/2426849.htm

 

[GB!]

but wouldn't the DNA test have shown up as positive then?
if there was any penetration of her (by finger, tongue or penis) wouldn't that have shown up on the DNA test?

also hard to take the word of a convicted fraudster/liar

 

[GB!]

You may have answered your own question!!

'it does not make sence' *uses the chewbakka defence*

 

[eagles4eva]

Either way, he gets his day in court, if he is guilty, lock him up, manly should also burn his contract, if innocent then he gets to play again when he recovers from his knee.

I just hope it doesn’t take another 12 months to resolve this crap

 

[madunit]

When he confronted Stewart, the Manly fullback said: "I didn't touch her, bro ... I live here, bro."

bro? Maybe this bloke has confused Brett Stewart with a Kiwi.

the player's girlfriend Jaime Baker had emerged from his house and said "not again" while pointing to his trousers and his belt, which was undone.

Maybe he starts urinating everywhere whenever he gets drunk, and that is what she was referring to.

Well, this is a shut and dried case.

 

[Eaglebuzz]

It's pretty disgraceful that the telecrap have a photo of Stewart with "I didn't touch her, bro" plastered over it. Those were the father's words, not Stewart's....

 

[Eels Dude]

but wouldn't the DNA test have shown up as positive then?
if there was any penetration of her (by finger, tongue or penis) wouldn't that have shown up on the DNA test?

also hard to take the word of a convicted fraudster/liar

It depends how long the DNA samples were taken after the incident occured. If it had been a number of hours then those DNA traces on the girl could easily have gone.

 

[El Diablo]

It's pretty disgraceful that the telecrap have a photo of Stewart with "I didn't touch her, bro" plastered over it. Those were the father's words, not Stewart's....

get Des Hasler on to them

 

[mickdo]

I heard he doesn't have a leg to stand on





boom boom ;-)

 

[taxidriver]

but wouldn't the DNA test have shown up as positive then?
if there was any penetration of her (by finger, tongue or penis) wouldn't that have shown up on the DNA test?

also hard to take the word of a convicted fraudster/liar

i didn't the victim was a convicted fraudster

 

[sneagle]

bro? Maybe this bloke has confused Brett Stewart with a Kiwi.

Maybe he starts urinating everywhere whenever he gets drunk, and that is what she was referring to.

Well, this is a shut and dried case.

I thought too, maybe he was trying take a wizz...
The story emerging now is so completely different to what was apparantly told to the smh, just before the alleged victim was taken to hospital, by the mother.
Who knows. At least he didn't add his previous supposed quote from Brett "Don't you know who I am?" this time.

 

[GB!]

i didn't the victim was a convicted fraudster

she wasn't, but her father is.

seems he is the only witness......:?

 

[Goddo]

Oh well, whatever prison he goes to will pick up a great fullback for their match against the prison guards.

 

[Noa]

but wouldn't the DNA test have shown up as positive then?
if there was any penetration of her (by finger, tongue or penis) wouldn't that have shown up on the DNA test?

also hard to take the word of a convicted fraudster/liar

Back in high-school on schoolcamps, blue light disco etc we had a fool-proof system to prove digital penetration.

 

[Parra Steve]

You would think considering the fathers past that they have more evidence than just his statement to go to trial. There was DNA testing done too wasnt there? perhaps they found something there.

 

[Eaglebuzz]

They didn't...