Funding for the QRL and NSWRL will be reduced to cover the expenses of Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth.
Didn't I mention this in my previous post?
Reserving three licences for Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth means three areas from the heartland miss out on progressing to the NRL. A club like the Brisbane Tigers has the capacity to generate more revenue from the broadcasters, provide better third party sponsorship deals for elite players and convert more juniors into NRL stars. Adelaide, Melbourne and Perth will never be anything but parasites that provide zero value to the broadcasters -- look at the cumulative ratings for NRL in these cities --- and poach talent from the heartland.
I read that part - I even mentioned it in my last post.
Again, that is not an example of destroying the histories and traditions of Sydney and Brisbane clubs. It is an example perhaps of people being upset and thinking something isn’t fair but again it is not destroying them. For example, if the Brisbane Tigers don’t get a licence (and they would have to create a new future history and tradition as an NRL club under a different name in any case) they will still have their history and tradition as a BRL club.
In fact, in order for those histories and traditions to be destroyed, you would have to destroy the game itself and by extension those clubs. That’s a hard argument for one to make considering the growth of the game and viewership et al.