noDolphins playing in blue?!
but hardly anything like Redcliffe either eh
noDolphins playing in blue?!
no
but hardly anything like Redcliffe either eh
and anyone using the too much blue argument
well how much more Green do we need in the NRL ??
The Dolphins did retain their traditional colours - they just added a shade of gold to it, to distinguish from St George-Illawarra Dragons.The Dolphins didn't retain their traditional colours so why would the Jets have to ?
Jets & blue & white go well together
more then 50 years of that association.
Emerald green and silver would be a nice addition to the nrl palette.
wonder what name the tigers will come up with? I’d be surprised of they choose anything this Time before getting the nod.
I really think the nrl needs to come out now and decide at least what area club 18 will be to stop people pissing away time and. Oney on bids that have no chan e. Throwing every option to the media each week is a pss poor strategy imo.
So , you're saying theres some replication in colour use in the NRL ?Cows, titans, knights, roosters, dogs, parra, raiders, warriors
And not choosing Perth …..Location is minor factor. Lots of other considerations like backers, junior production, long term security..
So , you're saying theres some replication in colour use in the NRL ?
well who knew
Agreed on emerald green & silver (maybe even with black as an accent too) - it'd be a really unique, eye-catching look.Emerald green and silver would be a nice addition to the nrl palette.
wonder what name the tigers will come up with? I’d be surprised of they choose anything this Time before getting the nod.
I really think the nrl needs to come out now and decide at least what area club 18 will be to stop people pissing away time and. Oney on bids that have no chan e. Throwing every option to the media each week is a pss poor strategy imo.
Agreed on emerald green & silver (maybe even with black as an accent too) - it'd be a really unique, eye-catching look.
I think the original post said it's unlikely Brisbane Easts going to abandon the Firehawks bid name - I dunno, I think it might grow on me.. but I really think any Brisbane 3 (or Queensland 5 for that matter) team would be a mistake for team 18 - and either Perth or NZ 2 would be a far better move.
The sad thing is that NRL HQ just seems to publicly brain-fart their way through decision making, firing out lip-service to so many locations & crazy schemes that you'd think they're going to 24 teams!
have you ?Have you ever watched NRL before?!
Ahh OK, I thought that meant they weren't gonna review it & would stick by it.. but I get that they're ditching it.It says the Firehawks name is unlikely to be revisited.
That's a shit wording, but I assume it's no longer proposed.
One article said they are 'Unlikely' to use it. I reckon they wont announce anything until the bid outcome is known. That way they cant face any backlash. A bid wont be decided on its logo at end of day.It says the Firehawks name is unlikely to be revisited.
That's a shit wording, but I assume it's no longer proposed.
if NRL wasnt so cuckolded to News Ltd they would have been Brisbane2 and we wouldn't be wasting another license in a city of 2.3million! Brisbane North, Firehawks South.only bid outside of perth that makes any sense and has the means to enter. all they need is a name/logo and they are an instant success
would be nice to finally get a second brisbane side
have you ?