mongoose
Coach
- Messages
- 11,808
everyone predicted Redcliffe, my pet goldfish predicted RedcliffeI predicted redcliffe years before they got in. Idiots here were saying firehawks up until decision. Easts tigers will be next.
everyone predicted Redcliffe, my pet goldfish predicted RedcliffeI predicted redcliffe years before they got in. Idiots here were saying firehawks up until decision. Easts tigers will be next.
They havent, a quick search on IP australia shows no trademarks have been registered for either Brisbane Sabres or Brisbane BengalsWhere was this ? Did not see it in the article.
What about PNG Bengals. Or Brisbane Bangals?They havent, a quick search on IP australia shows no trademarks have been registered for either Brisbane Sabres or Brisbane Bengals
Not on this forumeveryone predicted Redcliffe, my pet goldfish predicted Redcliffe
everyone predicted Redcliffe, my pet goldfish predicted Redcliffe
Not on this forum
they predicted Perth
or brisb easts
You've never beaten anyone in an argument.
It’s funnyYep, firehawks bandwagon was huge
I wanted easts as they presented as the best option as a genuine brisbane2...Dane, Perth red didn't. Your post history probably says otherwise if I could be bothered looking..
You didn’t even want a brisbane team you said it was a bad ideaI wanted easts as they presented as the best option as a genuine brisbane2.
Dolphins were likely favorite's as it encroached on Broncos least and we all know what news ltd wants news ltd gets from Vlandys.
What about PNG Bengals. Or Brisbane Bangals?
I wanted easts as they presented as the best option as a genuine brisbane2.
Dolphins were likely favorite's as it encroached on Broncos least and we all know what news ltd wants news ltd gets from Vlandys.
I am an expansionist, I want to see new markets grow for the game, adding same markets is boring and ultimately will be self defeating.You didn’t even want a brisbane team you said it was a bad idea
You aren’t an expansionist other than how it benefit you (Perth)I am an expansionist, I want to see new markets grow for the game, adding same markets is boring and ultimately will be self defeating.
My choice as an expansionist would have been
Perth club 17,
PNG or NZ2 club 18,
Brisbane2 club 19,
Adelaide/PNG/NZ2 club 20.
Having got Brisbane2, sort of, I most def dont want to see us spend a further license on Brisbane just because Brisbane2 wasnt the club it should have been.
not sure you thought that sentance through lolYou aren’t an expansionist other than how it benefit you (Perth)
You talk down any rival bid to Perthnot sure you thought that sentance through lol
Im an expansionist and also pro perth as I live here and it offers a compelling case as the most likely place to be able to sustainably grow the game into a brand new market.
Id be happy to see any teams come in next 3 as long as its not another nsw or qlnd one.
I don’t think Perth should get a teamYou talk down any rival bid to Perth
and then make exaggerate Perth
That’s not an expansionist
a real expansionist would accept pngs bid dwarfs anything Perth can muster and accept the defeat with grace and that’s it’s good for the game
then try and get the next spot
No fumbleball fan wanted another Brisbane NRL club for obvious reasons, especially the Dolphins with its huge junior development programsYou didn’t even want a brisbane team you said it was a bad idea
I want long term sustainable and viable clubs in new markets that grow RL beyond what it currently is. At the moment potentially Perth that fits that bill better than most.You talk down any rival bid to Perth
and then make exaggerate Perth
That’s not an expansionist
a real expansionist would accept pngs bid dwarfs anything Perth can muster and accept the defeat with grace and that’s it’s good for the game
then try and get the next spot