Iafeta
Referee
- Messages
- 24,357
woodgers said:Just on this topic that has managed to find its way into numerous threads. I love it, couldn't be more delighted. My club does really well when our backs are to the wall and no one expects anything out of us. Elliott, like him or not, also thrives on this attitude and is doing nothing really to defend against the people claiming we will get the spoon. He will have the 'seige' mentality in by round 2 against the Knights.
In my opinion, Canberra have done best with their backs NOT against the wall. The team that was nearly unbeatable had fabulous players, Mullins, Belcher, Meninga, Nadruku, Nagas, Wiki, Steve Walters, Todd, Pongia, Lomax, Lazarus, Clyde, Daley, Stuart - it was hardly backs against the walls stuff. For the record, I still tip Canberra for the spoon, which is not good given I grew up backing Daley and Stuart as heroes and thinking Meninga and co were gods, Canberra was the real deal, the green machine, we loved 'em over in NZ.
Personally, given that I hope I'm wrong. I see Souths improving this year a bit, so the other two teams that are in my eyes a chance at the spoon are Cronulla who just irk me for their ill discipline and lack of attacking depth, and the Warriors.
We may have a few injury prone players but that doesn't really bother me at this stage. I am pretty sure that our club would be the only one whereas the top 25 players would all have 1st grade experience. People can call us the pensioners club all they want but at the end of the day our average age in the top squad is 23 or something similar. If we have a dismal season then these players will no doubt gain a lot. If not and we do well then we are laying the platform for a premiership with so many young guys playing together and forming a squad for the future. What does Elliott have to lose, he will get sacked if we plod along in 8-10 position each year anyway?
I think the older players have come as Elliott has clutched at straws when he's realised just how many young players he is going to rely on. They need some older heads, but it seems to be a problem that players who've been in the ESL seem softer when they come back than when they went back. Generally it seems to take 3/4 a season for them to adapt, and with Smith and Adamson that doesn't leave a whole lot of time afterwards career wise.
I don't think Matt Elliott is the man for the job either anymore. Its in my opinion becoming a bit of a Daniel Anderson situation. Anderson/Elliott had formulas that seemingly worked fine for 2-3 years, all of a sudden they stopped working. I know Canberra made eighth last year, but fair dinkum, that style of play won't get you anywhere as the game gets quicker. Its like a golden oldies style play, 2 wide of the ruck MAX. Great for the first 70 metres, but where it counts, in the money zone, no creativity whatsoever.
Don't forget that Wiki was suspended for a large amount of 2003 & 2004. Davico had his fair share of injuries, McLinden was the little pig who couldn't jump the wall no matter how hard he tried and Drew isn't worth the bother explaining otherwise I would be here all day.
I think Ruben's influence off the paddock is where it'll count most. In New Zealand, he's practically a rugby league god for what he's done and who's he's done it to. If Ruben was still there with your Carney's and Weyman's, just his off field influence of man, I'm playing and learning off this legend - the same feeling Ruben got from Mel Meninga - would be invaluable.
I am not suggesting that we will win the comp. I am however very pleased that Elliott is starting with a better base than when he took over from Mal and is building for the future. I am thrilled he is backing the ability of our juniors, which makes you want to get out and support our local boys each week.
You need decent, experienced NRL halves to win a comp. I think for years 2007 onwards, the short term pain Canberra go through here will be beneficial. I think though it'd be foolish of the club to expect miracles straight up, or to have too high hopes. They've got to be patient with this lot coming through if they're as good as most say, apart from a few special players like your Sonny-Bill's, your Billy Slaters, most young players need a season or two in the top grade before they show their true potential. You've got to expect inexperienced errors, lack of organisation, lack of know how when the tough gets going. The worst thing though the club as a whole can do is get its hopes up too high and therefore make wholesale changes if things don't go too well.
Also, whoever wrote Brad Drew as a loss didn't see many Canberra games, although judging by a lot of assessments in this thread most people haven't watched too much of the Raiders anyway. Drew was Pathetic in his time here and that is being kind.
Agree. 2001 Brad Drew was unbelievable. Since then he's been ordinary. A bit of a nuff nuff. Either 2001 he overachieved, or since then he's been a massive underachiever. I suspect Lincoln Withers will do a much better job.