What do you feel is wrong with the bid that a different bid would improve?
Community engagement is missing for one, They have had huge natural disaster which lend a huge opportunity for any SEQ based bid to help out the community. You can argue that Brisbane2 at this stage was still an infant, and fair enough as well but people from those areas are still suffering today. A financial input into junior footy in the area would be an obvious starting point. Also, if the WA bid can get members then surely the any Queensland bid can put together some membership drives together to get the community feeling apart of it.
Secondly, the Brisbane 2 bid by their own admission are suppose to be a alternative choice to the Broncos. Yet the business is run very similar to the Broncos and i would go as far to describe it as a duplicate of the Broncos.
I don't like Davidson's attitude towards the bid and thus the bids attitude altogether and i don't think his motives to owning a NRL club are the right motives for the NRL to progress into the future. I also don't like the reaction from the bid when the NRL said a flat out no to having Centrebet be part owners of the potential team.
I would support a Brisbane or South East Queensland bid that would engage the community, both members and junior footy that contributed back to the area instead of staying in their offices that worked with the NRL in meeting whatever criteria the NRL will hold these bids to. This would by definition give the people of South East Queensland a true alternative to the Brisbane Broncos.
