Fufu Andronez
First Grade
- Messages
- 8,464
Sucks for the VFL
Victorian’s really love their Rugba league
Sucks for the VFL
Victorian’s really love their Rugba league
Not a surprise really, Victoria has been one of the strictest states with restrictions and I think the only one that hasn't started relaxing anything. The premier has made it clear he wont be relaxing or making any concessions until at least May 11, maybe after then the team will be allowed to return to AAMI park.
Victorian’s really love their Rugba league
Sucks for the VFL
Not a surprise really, Victoria has been one of the strictest states with restrictions and I think the only one that hasn't started relaxing anything. The premier has made it clear he wont be relaxing or making any concessions until at least May 11, maybe after then the team will be allowed to return to AAMI park.
Has any announcement been made about where the games will be played? is it still all in one venue or wherever the teams are based (so Storm home games in Albury, Warriors in Tamworth/CC, etc.)
If Melbourne is off the table would be Canberra due to cost and difficulties fitting out grounds it will be limited what grounds used.
I heard GC/Bri share.
NZ will share Newcastle
Only 4 grounds in Sydney etc
If Melbourne is off the table would be Canberra due to cost and difficulties fitting out grounds it will be limited what grounds used.
I heard GC/Bri share.
NZ will share Newcastle
Only 4 grounds in Sydney etc
Watch out TerrigalWarriors are moving to the Central Coast after their quarantine so that would make sense.
With the banning of crowds, would there be any thought to picking grounds across the states, that with appropriate professional facilities, also has visual appeal on TV, such as mountain backgrounds, coastal etc? Empty seats at the games, why not pick somewhere that has a potential for the best TV presentation?
Victorian Health Minister Jenny Mikakos said there would be no "special treatment"... [Melbourne Storm's] exemption to train inside Victoria's border had been rejected.That's why the AFL is desperado to get their players in to hubs in NT, NSW or QLD where they'll be allowed to operate as the Vic Govt won't allow anything in Melbourne / VIC ATM. And funnily, the Vic players are reluctant to do it, so the AFL might end up screwing the pooch.
Victorian Health Minister Jenny Mikakos said there would be no "special treatment"... [Melbourne Storm's] exemption to train inside Victoria's border had been rejected.
"They sought an exemption, that exemption was not granted, no one is going to be getting special treatment," she said.
[Source]
This is a relatively easy fix for the NRL, one team seeking clearance to train in Albury. But what of the nine AFL teams based in Melbourne?
As predicted, the NRL has paved the way and AFL are now keen to follow suit.
If the Vic health minister is fair dinkum, the "no special treatment" rule should apply to the AFL as well. It will be interesting to see how this pans out.
There wouldn’t be too many grounds that would have adequate lighting or the right facilities for best camera angles without bringing in plenty of infrastructure. Someone would have to pick up the cost and the local councils that usually pay wouldn’t do so because there wouldn’t be the crowds.With the banning of crowds, would there be any thought to picking grounds across the states, that with appropriate professional facilities, also has visual appeal on TV, such as mountain backgrounds, coastal etc? Empty seats at the games, why not pick somewhere that has a potential for the best TV presentation?
NRL set a date, May 28 and essentially said failure is not an option.The tighter restrictions in Vic will mean that there would need to be other states used if there is a re-commencement of the AFL competition and that has caused great consternation, especially with players with young or sick families. A delicate situation at the moment with some players seemingly rubbing the public up the wrong way, it's a difficult situation to read. A little different to the attitude the Warriors are taking, being away from their families for a few months to sacrifice and get this show on the road again. The level of restrictions in NSW and QLD give the NRL greater flexibility in how they can manage the return.
The talk here is the likelihood of hubs for AFL teams to play games in across states where the exception is granted, 6-8 weeks has been the estimate and by that time the situation would be re-evaluated. NT have even wanted games as they have indicated a possibility of crowds being able to attend the games. NRL in the box seat regarding their options for the remainder of the year given the conditions across NSW and QLD.
One could make the argument that the NRL has got to this point in spite of its leadership. That this crisis is being used as a cover to do some pretty horrific long-term damage to the code in terms of brodcast revenue and digital assets (not to mention sacking a CEO mid-crisis) seems to have escaped many.Their lack of leadership is a bigger hurdle.
I think Greenberg's departure has been pretty crucial to the NRL's comeback.One could make the argument that the NRL has got to this point in spite of its leadership. That this crisis is being used as a cover to do some pretty horrific long-term damage to the code in terms of brodcast revenue and digital assets (not to mention sacking a CEO mid-crisis) seems to have escaped many.
Get off Toddles ****One could make the argument that the NRL has got to this point in spite of its leadership. That this crisis is being used as a cover to do some pretty horrific long-term damage to the code in terms of brodcast revenue and digital assets (not to mention sacking a CEO mid-crisis) seems to have escaped many.
Because it pleased broadcasters?I think Greenberg's departure has been pretty crucial to the NRL's comeback.
Can't see toddles doing what PVL has the last few weeks .Because it pleased broadcasters?
Doesn't mean it was necessarily best for the game.
I'm saying we're better off without him (Greenberg).Because it pleased broadcasters?
Doesn't mean it was necessarily best for the game.
A bit of North Sydney Oval would go down a treatWith the banning of crowds, would there be any thought to picking grounds across the states, that with appropriate professional facilities, also has visual appeal on TV, such as mountain backgrounds, coastal etc? Empty seats at the games, why not pick somewhere that has a potential for the best TV presentation?