Recommendation you'd think. I took it as - In a room that is 100m2, you should avoid having more that 25 people.New social distancing requirement 4m2 per person. That will hurt cafes etc. is it a requirement or a recommendation? it’s always hard to know with Scomos speeches. Presumably you aren’t going to be able to sit at a table with someone?
New social distancing requirement 4m2 per person. That will hurt cafes etc. is it a requirement or a recommendation? it’s always hard to know with Scomos speeches. Presumably you aren’t going to be able to sit at a table with someone?
So im guessing another government just came out with that and scomo just borrowed it
Well he cant use his "watch the cricket" idea anymoreWell NZ have already done it I think so thats probably where he got it
Sorry wibble but in the class room they can control the distance they can also follow a chain of infection if it exists.
My immediate family has 2 teachers (wife and one son) and thats just our opinion, right or wrong. But I am happy with the notion that the decisions are being based on those of a medical expert in the appropriate field, not me, not the media and especially not internet experts
NRL getting some negative headlines again - now with backlash over team having access to Testing Kits despite not meeting the criteria that the general population has to meet.
https://www.news.com.au/sport/nrl/n...e/news-story/53e16eb5221bd2d5af0b48886935a2c7
How can the distance be controlled in a class room? I'm waiting for anyone to give out some practical advice on that matter, from the PM, Premiers, AHPPC, medical experts, or any state department of health or of education, or even media or internet experts. I've asked on this forum as people tell me to calm down on the issue, and yet none tell me how it is possible.
You can't get close to the 1.5 m separation distance. Even the more generous 4 metres squared (generous as in, lower area and less social distancing but more risk) is impossible.
30 kids and a teacher into a 6 x 6 m room. Draw me a diagram of how social distancing works there.
I know this sounds aggro to some here who have delighted in sniping at me, but I'm genuinely interested in how such social distancing can work, since people tell me either that it can, but don't tell me how, or that they don't know how either but to chill out about it, even though it is what we are being asked to do for our own safety and for the safety of the community.
I agree that they could follow a chain of infection, like they do in Singapore, the oft quoted other hold out on closing schools, but they're not. Not like Singapore are. But does that mean you are saying we should cram kids together to help spread infection then we can follow the chains?
Although in Singapore they are social distancing in the class room. They are halving class sizes (I don't know to what size, or the size of their classrooms). I have no idea how they're doing that, but again, if you can think of a way to halve class sizes here, let me know (seems to me you'd need about twice as many class rooms and teachers if you halved class sizes. Maybe we can put hotels and airline workers to use....).
Which medical experts are you happy with? The ones who decide we need to social distance 1.5 m, or the ones who say we can do that in school? Because if they're the same ones, they also haven't shared their wisdom with us internet experts on how it can be done.
How can the distance be controlled in a class room? I'm waiting for anyone to give out some practical advice on that matter, from the PM, Premiers, AHPPC, medical experts, or any state department of health or of education, or even media or internet experts. I've asked on this forum as people tell me to calm down on the issue, and yet none tell me how it is possible.
You can't get close to the 1.5 m separation distance. Even the more generous 4 metres squared (generous as in, lower area and less social distancing but more risk) is impossible.
30 kids and a teacher into a 6 x 6 m room. Draw me a diagram of how social distancing works there.
I know this sounds aggro to some here who have delighted in sniping at me, but I'm genuinely interested in how such social distancing can work, since people tell me either that it can, but don't tell me how, or that they don't know how either but to chill out about it, even though it is what we are being asked to do for our own safety and for the safety of the community.
I agree that they could follow a chain of infection, like they do in Singapore, the oft quoted other hold out on closing schools, but they're not. Not like Singapore are. But does that mean you are saying we should cram kids together to help spread infection then we can follow the chains?
Although in Singapore they are social distancing in the class room. They are halving class sizes (I don't know to what size, or the size of their classrooms). I have no idea how they're doing that, but again, if you can think of a way to halve class sizes here, let me know (seems to me you'd need about twice as many class rooms and teachers if you halved class sizes. Maybe we can put hotels and airline workers to use....).
Which medical experts are you happy with? The ones who decide we need to social distance 1.5 m, or the ones who say we can do that in school? Because if they're the same ones, they also haven't shared their wisdom with us internet experts on how it can be done.
I'm genuinely interested in how such social distancing can work
Nice touch there by the Dragons.
As I've said to you many times you are focussing on one aspect of social distancing to the determent of your argument. You are picking up a fluffed comment from Morrison in a 30 min plus press conference. If you watched the following press conference the Chief Medical Officer was present and actually stated that although the 1.5 metre distancing was not feasible in classrooms that schools were implementing other practices to negate this. Which is what you have been told many times in this thread!
And you keep ignoring the point.
I was specifically answering the statement "in the class room they can control the distance".
Which of your list of items addresses this?
The entire purpose of your list of social distancing items is to keep people apart, to stop the transfer of disease from one person to another (the other items are isolation and personal hygiene items, which are also tricky in a school (tricky with children in general), but not impossible). You could vacuum seal kids for the 60 minutes or so each day they are at school but not in class, it wouldn't matter. If they then get squashed together for 5 hours, it defeats the point of trying so hard to keep them apart for 60 minutes.
It's like not banning crowds of 1000 or 2000 at a footy match, but saying it is OK because you've got rules in place for how they enter the stadium, line up for food, or go to the toilet.
I have explained how 1 person with an infection could easily spread it to 1000 others in a school setting, and neither your suggestions nor any of the items on that list make that an unlikely scenario.
The best case that schools don't create some super spreaders, who would be terrible for the community, is either that children can't transmit the disease (which the departments of health and education have said is a justification for keeping schools open despite no one actually knowing how true this might be), or that schools are closed (which is why they will be in a week or so regardless of the number of pointless lunchtime and excursion practises we adopt).
Ill chuck my 2 cents in with the school and social distancing argument. Yea in theory it is possible and can function ok but there is a point getting glossed over. Had anyone actually told a small child (so focusing first graders here) to do the simplest and most basic of tasks? (such as stay in this area and dont go near that person).
I have told my very much younger cousins at that age to not stick their hand in a campfire and they still tried it. The health bored are relying on the only human creatures that are the only thing more derptarded than asian tourists