MEMBERSHIPS. The Swans i'm guessing have around 24K season ticket holders. A fair slab of these people probably wouldn't have turned up if they hadn't already paid for their tickets. It will be the same in the NRL. In 2-3 years, possibly earlier. We will start to see the decline in sub 10K crowds. As soon as season ticket holders for EVERY team hits around 11K, we should see NO sub 10K, unless extraordinary conditions occur. The membership growth will continue until no team will get any sub 20K etc.
ANY expansion team should be set a goal of 15K+ memberships in their opening season. This has been done well by the AFL in the case of the Suns, where they have 10K people turning up to every Suns home game no matter how badlylol
they are going.
In passing seasons we haven't capitalized on teams successes, they have an outstandingly successful season and their crowds shoot up, but as soon as they start playing badly again their crowds plummet. This cycle has continued for too long. With memberships, we have observed crowds building off successful seasons and membership numbers rarely decrease in teams, making it alot easier to build on the successful seasons.
These are exciting times for the NRL. I can really see in 5 years we will be averaging 20K+.
Would there have been 25k at Suncorp in the rain to watch, say, the Titans take on Penrith?
Raiderdave - I reckon a 5.2 magnitude earthquake, even if it is minor, is a little scary and might've prompted people to stay at home.
Actually, Canterbury v North Queensland at Suncorp in 2008 drew in 8,549. Suncorp isn't infallible when it comes to sh*thouse NRL crowds.There would of been more than 8600...
Which is what my post was comparing. :roll:
This is what gets me - people don't understand that no matter where you are, weather and even minor earthquakes are genuine fears.what ... at 1pm in the afternoon or whateva it was ?
please .... thats rubbish
that wouldn't have stopped many from going ...most cowboy fans had no intention of going in the first place .. minor earth tremor or no minor earth tremor....
lets call it what it was & not offer up lame excuses ... a pathetic turnout
The majority of low crowds each season involve Sydney teams playing out of town teams. The smallest crowd for each of the past five seasons involved a Sydney team playing a team from outside of Sydney. I am not sure how you solve this problem.
Actually, Canterbury v North Queensland at Suncorp in 2008 drew in 8,549. Suncorp isn't infallible when it comes to sh*thouse NRL crowds.
But I'm sure there's an excuse, right? :roll:
This is what gets me - people don't understand that no matter where you are, weather and even minor earthquakes are genuine fears.
Amongst people on this forum who are generally single or married guys or girls in their late teens, twenties or early thirties, we have the disposable income and the passionate support for our teams to get out there.
What we're forgetting is that more than 50% (if not more) of a crowd is made up of families, sometimes young families. If it's pissing down rain, families are going to be less inclined to go. Hysterical or not, if there's an earthquake, some families may think twice.
It's a fact of life and while you might get away with labelling people in their 20's with no attachments "a softcock" for not going to a game in bad weather, it's hardly fair to say weather or natural events aren't an excuse when families have young children and health to think of.
The Broncos pulled 25k on a MONDAY IN THE RAIN.
Pull you head in. 8600 whatever way you spin it is not as good "crowd wise" had the game been played (minus the Broncos) in BNE or Perth in the same conditions...
:lol:Actually, Canterbury v North Queensland at Suncorp in 2008 drew in 8,549. Suncorp isn't infallible when it comes to sh*thouse NRL crowds.
But I'm sure there's an excuse, right? :roll:
Roosters more than competitive? They've won 2/5, neither in convincing circumstances.
But that's right - torrential, flooding weather is no excuse for people to turn up :roll: