gregstar said:i'm curious to know what would happen if a player did that to Ricko?
gregstar said:i'm curious to know what would happen if a player did that to Ricko?
KFC said:I think Ross shoukld have been allowed to play. Just cause his team got a week off for being successfull shouldn't penalise him.
As to the Ricko incident.
IT WAS A FIGHT!!!.
Players came in from everywhere.
FFS it was nothing like Bird or Williams.
KFC said:Crocker was taken out in back play by O'Donnell and nothing was done.
KFC said:gregstar said:i'm curious to know what would happen if a player did that to Ricko?
Crocker was taken out in back play by O'Donnell and nothing was done.
TheEye said:I used to think this Roosters judiciary bias was a load of crap, until Finch got off.
For F$%K sake - Finch DID NOT get off.
He was guilty of a down graded charge. The same as a number of players through the year.
Because of his previous good record he did not miss a week.
There is a BIG difference.
bwha ha ha ha ha!!!!!! oh my that was good - thanks raider!i feel for ricko, i really do
gregstar said:bwha ha ha ha ha!!!!!! oh my that was good - thanks raider!i feel for ricko, i really do
nafe1982 said:Will you honestly tell me if Finch's dad wasn't boss of reffereeing he would still have been downgraded????? I didn't think so
](*,) bloody roosters supporters
what bit?seriously i do feel abit for the bloke
gregstar said:what bit?seriously i do feel abit for the bloke