southwalesrabbitoh
Juniors
- Messages
- 2,399
I don't want Folau in the NRL. Saying some ppl are not born gay is, well, wrong, unfortunately some are born gay.
He's been sanctioned under the RA Code of Conduct which can be downloaded here: https://www.rugbyau.com/about/codes-and-policies/all-codes-and-policies
It's cut and dried he's violated point 1.3, and arguable that he's violated 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8.
The "only reason this has dragged on so long" is because like anybody, he took up his right to challenge/appeal their decision and RA has to hold such hearings to allow him to so appeal.
Fitz doesn't get it right very often, but on this occasion he's nailed it.Yep, even old Hanky Head has spelt out the issues involved, in very simple language to boot - https://www.smh.com.au/sport/taniela-tupou-can-i-ask-you-what-would-jesus-do-20190501-p51j5y.html
Glen Lazarus
John Ribot (aka Judas)
Daniel Abraham
Joel Caine
Solomone Kata
Mary McGregor
I am totally unaware of RA's Code of Conduct but I'd suggest that if it was clear cut, it would be over by now and its not.
You post said that Izzy is in breach of the conditions of HIS contract. Based on his last hearing and the length of time its taking, it appears that that is not correct.
Yep, even old Hanky Head has spelt out the issues involved, in very simple language to boot - https://www.smh.com.au/sport/taniela-tupou-can-i-ask-you-what-would-jesus-do-20190501-p51j5y.html
He's been sanctioned under the RA Code of Conduct which can be downloaded here: https://www.rugbyau.com/about/codes-and-policies/all-codes-and-policies
It's cut and dried he's violated point 1.3, and arguable that he's violated 1.6, 1.7 and 1.8.
The "only reason this has dragged on so long" is because like anybody, he took up his right to challenge/appeal their decision and RA has to hold such hearings to allow him to so appeal.
No question.
My original point was correcting Bazal when he said it was a specific clause in Izzy's contract had been breached.
Except Bazal was completely correct. The clause in his contract (and pretty much any employment contract you'd find) would be that he would abide by the company's code of conduct.No question.
My original point was correcting Bazal when he said it was a specific clause in Izzy's contract had been breached.
Sounds pedantic.No question.
My original point was correcting Bazal when he said it was a specific clause in Izzy's contract had been breached.
No question.
My original point was correcting Bazal when he said it was a specific clause in Izzy's contract had been breached.
Sounds pedantic.
(and I should know)
Bazal said:How is it that people STILL don't understand that he was sacked not because of his beliefs, but because he chose to express them in a way that breached the conditions of his contract of employment???
And what a monumental loss that fat lazy heap would be to the wobblies. Not sure why international rugby is still a thing tbh, everyone's been playing for second place for 15 years. It's so f**king boring.Guy who refers to himself as "Tongan Thor" getting on a high horse about religion.
It's not even correct. I never mentioned a clause.
As I said earlier, I have never seen any contract that disavows the contracted person of the requirement to adhere to the organisations code of conduct.
Anyway I'm totally over deadshit Folau, but people misrepresenting what I said irks me.
I don't want Folau in the NRL. Saying some ppl are not born gay is, well, wrong, unfortunately some are born gay.
Poor Izzy. Couldn’t control his fingers from typing stuff which clearly contravenes his employers values despite several warnings. It’s everybody else’s fault!As a pathological liar and drunk I took enormous offence at his comments. However I believe the thought police should stay off people's twitter accounts and Izzy hasn't done anything wrong.
Poor Izzy. Couldn’t control his fingers from typing stuff which clearly contravenes his employers values despite several warnings. It’s everybody else’s fault!
Can you point me in the direction of what was said in the hearings? I genuinely haven't seen any reporting on it.FWIW it wasnt my intention and I dont hold particularly strong opinions on it. Initially my motivation in making that comment wasnt so much to "prove you wrong" but to shine a light on the stupidity of RA which was borne out in the hearing when they said that they told Izzy that they wanted to renegotiate his contract to insert new social media clauses and he told them to go forth and copulate with themselves. that is why i was focusing on that point
Im also over the whole thing
As a pathological liar and drunk I took enormous offence at his comments. However I believe the thought police should stay off people's twitter accounts and Izzy hasn't done anything wrong.