You honestly believe they got Cronk for less??? Lololololol!! Pearce was one of the worst big game halves of the last 20 years. How he got so many games for NSW is one for Ripleys. They win 2 in a row with Cronk after dumping Myth Piss. Just a coincidence I suppose......He played 238 games for them. If he was shit they would've figured it out long before that. The fact is he was the most highly paid player and they had the opportunity to bring in Cronk for less money. This allowed them to sign Tedesco and retain a bunch of other players. Scapegoating Pearce is just the narrative invented by small brains looking for a simple explanation.
Should this come with a winky face?BA will be a super coach soon.
He just needs to jag a comp or 2 and he’s set.Should this come with a winky face?
I’d say it’s usually at its loudest as a result of performances.some gripe isn’t always revolving around performances and you know that.
Overall our recruitment has been solid. We were paying overs when we had to but we aren’t anymore.some abysmal recruitment
Some stupid $$$ thrown at players
Like most coaches he has players that he gravitates towards. Who the f**k knows why Bennett kept picking Darius? He trusted him.Bizarre team selection
Bizarre use of the bench
Such as? I don’t think we’ve hung on to too many that we should have let go of because it was detrimentally impacting on the squad. In most of the criticism I have seen people lose sight of the role of backups.Some abysmal retention
I’m sure there is.I’m sure there’s other things
You are on drugs if you think that BA is given a team by MON.The best thing the board done was take recruitment out of his hands.
Was it a coincidence that they were able to sign Tedesco and retain a bunch of others with Pearce off the books? You need to look a bit deeper for causal relationships.You honestly believe they got Cronk for less??? Lololololol!! Pearce was one of the worst big game halves of the last 20 years. How he got so many games for NSW is one for Ripleys. They win 2 in a row with Cronk after dumping Myth Piss. Just a coincidence I suppose......
Nah everything has one simple explanation and it's the coach ffsOk I’m attempting to summarize for the peeps that haven’t read the past few pages.
We lost to south’s, because we had injuries. But south’s also had a few too, their outside backs had no names. But cowboys beat us in 17, who also had injuries. Scott and Thurston. But they had 4 origin players to our zero. But in 2020 we only had RCG and fergo who had previously played origin. But we can’t count Paulo, gutho, Nrown as origin players because origin wasn’t till after the finals, where they debuted.
so the excuse of injuries only applies to us when we lose to a favorite. But when we lost to an outsider, it was only because they had more origin players. And last season we lost because origin wasn’t played till after the finals. Had it been before, we may of come good and won???
Have I missed any particular excuse out?
Origin was covered.
Injuries were covered.
f^*k me dead, I forgot to factor in differential.
Was it a coincidence that they were able to sign Tedesco and retain a bunch of others with Pearce off the books? You need to look a bit deeper for causal relationships.
Nah everything has one simple explanation and it's the coach ffs
*CasualYou need to look a bit deeper for causal relationships.
Cronk wanted to live in Sydney with his missus and presumably wanted to play for a premiership contender. He also wanted to set his media career up post-footy. All those factors kept his price down. Meanwhile Pearce has shown he's motivated by money by going to Newcastle.You honestly can’t be that silly to suggest Cronk was cheaper than pearce and that’s the only way they could sign teddy.
Autocorrect tried to f**k me around.*Casual
Sounds like a bunch of excuses to me, excuse boy!2017 - Gutho did his knee a few weeks from the end of the season - he was in very good form ..... I think it f**ked us significantly even tho Will Smith had some decent games
What am I ignoring? When we've lost finals matches it's been to better teams. Two indicators of a team's quality are number of Origin-class players and points differential. Gambling odds in a given game are a very unreliable indicator. We were paying about $3 to beat Canberra on Saturday ffsYou can’t use excuses just to suit an argument when you want it to. And then ignore that same excuse in other instances.
The stats just show we've been never had the best team in the finals.Don’t take it personal. He’s a good coach. But the stats show there’s limitations.
Cronk wanted to live in Sydney with his missus and presumably wanted to play for a premiership contender. He also wanted to set his media career up post-footy. All those factors kept his price down. Meanwhile Pearce has shown he's motivated by money by going to Newcastle.
What’s that got to do with anything?Bro are you sure you’re wired correctly? Are you taking the piss now? Pearce was moved on. 80 be your eyes. If Cronk decided today to come out of retirement I dare say he’d command more money than Pearce.
What’s that got to do with anything?
No-one is saying Pearce is a better player than Cronk but there’s no doubt that the Roosters got Cronk cheap and were able to sweeten it with a bunch of other media, coaching stuff.
Do you remember the stink that people kicked up when it happened and all the jokes about Uncle Nick’s dodgy salary cap?
I also don’t think a club like the Roosters arseholes their halfback without having a plan B in place.
If you look too deeply the relationships won’t be too causal.Was it a coincidence that they were able to sign Tedesco and retain a bunch of others with Pearce off the books? You need to look a bit deeper for causal relationships.