Dylan Brown - charged sexual touching

[IFR33K]

‘I would let her’? Does she need your permission to do, well, anything?

Um, she’s his wife. What does it matter to you?

 

[Pneuma]

Um, she’s his wife. What does it matter to you?

Because he wrote it as if it’s normal for wives to need to get permission from their husbands to do things. If you think that is normal that is your problem and says a great deal about you.

 

[Pneuma]

Fair enough. Gods aside, I think he erred but should be forgiven too, as the court has delivered the sentence they see fit - it's non-custodial and I don't believe there's a case for the NRL to make him miss any more games (perhaps a fine though).

Well, it's not the end of the world, but that doesn't make it right. Or make it so that the crime should be diminished - that's what we have courts for, and they've handed down their finding and penalty, which Brown is not disputing.

No apparently anything not as bad as the war in Ukraine is okay. Great logic from pumpkin.

 

[Pneuma]

Reading some of the posts here you’d think it was the 1950s. ‘She wore a short skirt so she was asking for it’. Dear me.

 

[Gronk]

Reading some of the posts here you’d think it was the 1950s. ‘She wore a short skirt so she was asking for it’. Dear me.

 

[Pneuma]

View attachment 76347

Well played sir

 

[IFR33K]

Because he wrote it as if it’s normal for wives to need to get permission from their husbands to do things. If you think that is normal that is your problem and says a great deal about you.

I have no problem.

 

[Pneuma]

I have no problem.

Sure

 

[IFR33K]

Sure

Maybe people should consult you on tips for their marriage.

 

[Pneuma]

Maybe people should consult you on tips for their marriage.

I’d tell them to avoid you. And I’d advise them women are not chattels.

 

[IFR33K]

I’d tell them to avoid you. And I’d advise them women are not chattels.

Hold that thought champ, I need to tell the wife something…

 

[Pneuma]

I’d tell them to avoid you. And I’d advise them women are not chattels.

Look it up first.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

It’s supposed to be a letter written by the Apostle Paul.
Funnily enough most critical scholars see it was a pseudepigraphal so this alleged piece of holy scripture is actually a forgery written by someone pretending to be Paul.

I think the idea of 'critical scholarship' misses the point. If a holy book is indeed inspired by the divine, then the process of getting the words onto the page is irrelevant. Deities can deliver their message through charlatans just as well as through genuine prophets like Neil deGrasse Tyson and Andrew Tate.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

There is no judgement day

Your skyman exists only in the minds of man.

Like all skymen.

I would argue that's the most important place for them to exist. An objective god leaves no room for free will.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

The whole reducing Testosterone will make women safe rhetoric is garbage.

Obviously. It only makes them safe from low-testosterone men.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

‘I would let her’? Does she need your permission to do, well, anything?

If she wants to stay married then yes. My wife can't stop me doing anything but there are lines I could cross that would lead to divorce. Equality means that it goes the same for her too.

 

[Poupou Escobar]

You're seriously equating (sexually) touching someone without consent to talking to or looking at someone...?

Rightio then.

What matters is how the victim feels, isn't it? Looking at people has always had the potential to cause offence or intimidation. How do you think the term "What the f**k are you looking at?" came about?

Sydney nightclub bans staring as part of crackdown on creepy behaviour

Club 77 says it will have a designated safety officer on duty to protect patrons from unwanted attention, including leering, which the Human Rights Commission defines as a form of sexual harassment.

www.abc.net.au

 

[Eelectrica]

Timothy is a bible writer inspired by the holy spirit.

Probably should have eased up on those holy spirits.

 

[the phantom menace]

What matters is how the victim feels, isn't it? Looking at people has always had the potential to cause offence or intimidation. How do you think the term "What the f**k are you looking at?" came about?

Sydney nightclub bans staring as part of crackdown on creepy behaviour

Club 77 says it will have a designated safety officer on duty to protect patrons from unwanted attention, including leering, which the Human Rights Commission defines as a form of sexual harassment.

www.abc.net.au

So you are equating sexually touching someone without consent to looking at them? Or just attempting to argue around what you'd posted...?

Bruce has some advice:

 

[the phantom menace]

If she wants to stay married then yes. My wife can't stop me doing anything but there are lines I could cross that would lead to divorce. Equality means that it goes the same for her too.

Looks like some of the uptight people on this page need to look up ethical non-monogomy, and just relax.

Each to their own, but imo marriages/partnerships shouldn't be about women needing permissions or ownership either way... peace out dudes .