ash411
Bench
- Messages
- 3,411
Peats and teps
Why are people so keen to get rid of Peats? He's a good player, and our long term starting hooker. But no, yeah, let's dump him in favour of his 40 year old backup...
Peats and teps
bring back Spags
I don't agree with that.
Who would you suggest?
You want to get rid of our hooker and lock?
How much do you think the Raiders would be willing to pay Junior Paulo this season? Not full freight I'm sure. They still have a salary cap themselves.
Watmough's insurance will solve most of the problem now that we're not paying Morgan as well.
Why are people so keen to get rid of Peats? He's a good player, and our long term starting hooker. But no, yeah, let's dump him in favour of his 40 year old backup...
Bring back the plumb.er lol
Key positions in every club are the 1,6,7 and 9.
Peats is one the key players at our club and is in our long term plans.
No team looking to pick up a player is going to pay full market for them, we're going to have to discount somewhat.
I think half his freight would be fair, yes we are less than half way through the season, but we're gonna have to take a hit at some point.
No team looking to pick up a player is going to pay full market for them, we're going to have to discount somewhat.
Join the club, the boss sent me home after I nearly murdered a Bronco co worker for being a smarmy douche and branding us as cheats.
I hope the club isnt stupid enough to fight it - someone needs to out there hand up and admit what they did
I am sick of the 'blame everyone else' attitude....
Watmough is the key. He gets us aaaaaaalmost back to February compliance and gives us our points back.
If the information that we are receiving is that this is going to happen and is simply a matter of time for the insurance process to be thoroughly gone through, then we don't shed anyone. We hold our ground, make a public declaration of our intent to get our points back via this method and then watch the NRL scramble.
Latest from Amy Dale in the Supreme Court just now...
Arthur Moses SC, acting for the suspended Eels officials, has asked the court if there had been "a breach of procedural fairness" in the handling of the matter.
He has sought for an injunction, preventing the NRL "from acting upon or treating as valid" their notices until the case can proceed to a full hearing as early as next week.
"Prior notice has to be given before a suspension is imposed," Mr Moses told the court.
The court heard that at this morning's meeting, the club was told of the penalties and impending public statement concerning it.
http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sp...l/news-story/d6118c643a47db833587c4e4bca83cf1