Mr. Fahrenheit
Referee
- Messages
- 22,132
but, id rather the relocation occur before a new franchise.
I was going to correct you on Mackay until I looked it up. That place must have really got a move on in the last decade (well the whole of NQ has). I've always had it pegged as smaller than Rocky in the 40k to 50k range.aarondoyle said:Rocky only has a population of 60k.
If you wanted another Qld city, there's Mackay - 80k, Cairns - 120k or the Sunshine Coast - 280k.
greenhat said:I don't know that much about Brisbane
but what about a combined north brisbane/sunshine team
with a name like:
'Sunshine Norths Dolphins'
unless theres some kind of blood rivalry between the devils and dolphins?
though I think QLD should be left alone for a fair few years to let the Titans really settle in
Perth has gotta be next
that boat will sail to the force unless the Reds can get in soon
Perth Red said:Frustrating thing is we can all see it so why can't Gallop? Some strategic direction for expansion (even if it is over the next 10 years god forbid!) would be a start rather than "consolidation" which is just another word for stagnation as far as i'm concerned.
nqboy said:From bad to worse Greenhat.
no.2_lukeburt said:On expansion, im against having an adelaide team.
a) decreasing and aging population.
b) too obsessed with AFL and very insular.
The priority list for expansion should be (imo)
1) Relocation to CC (3yrs)
2) Perth Team (3-5yrs)
3) Wellington Team (5yrs)
4) 4th QLD team (7-8yrs)
5) 2nd Vic team (7-10yrs)
1. CC is RL heartland that simply NEEDS a team, and before becoming 'national' i think we should take care of all the areas that has tremendous RL support and corporate dollars.
2. This is a requirement to halt the inroads that RU have been able to make, Perth, unlike adelaide will embrace other codes of footy and there is sufficient sponsorship/possible crowd support if the NRL suffer the short term losses.
3. A popuation of > 4 Million simply demands a second team, especially if there is a possibility for RL to take over some of the ground the soccer will relinquish when NZ lose thier A league team. There needs to be alot of marketing for this team to be a success, but knowing Kind, i wont hold my breath.
4. arguably the heartland of RL, will eventually demand and cater for a 4th franchise. Probably in SE QLD, although a Rockhampton based team will do well for the 'national game' image.
5. > 1 million people watched the GF. If there is sport, melbournians would love to watch it. People may laugh at the inability of the storm to draw crowds, but without the suffient groundwork this was never possible. If the pro AFL propoganda is to be restricted, and facts were reported as facts without ridiculing RL (calling us neanderthals etc.) this team could easily work.
There are 4 extra teams, and 1 relocation in my suggestion. Ideally an 18 team competition would work, so therefore i am of the view that some Sydney based franchises should either pack up shop or merge. however, if RL blooms to unimaginable heights there is no reason that we cant support a 20 team comp.
Sponsors and television networks - ie. the ones that provide most of the game's funding. Both will pay more for access to a national market.Pazza said:we got teams in Brisbane, sydney, canberra and melbourne! who gives a sh*t about perth and adelade