Didn't we sign Kemp for 2 years? I hate, hate,
HATE with a passion when the club releases players mid term. It's a cover up for poor recruitment strategies and a poor progression plan. Wayne Scurrah said one of the things he wanted to stop at the club was the players leaving mid contract, before he had come the likes of Jones, Fa'afili, Mellars, Tookey, Toopi, Meli, Betham had all gone within their contractual periods... it just sets a very bad precedent for attracting players when you show a blatant disregard for contractual obligations. Seemed to me the management was getting it right, and now we find that Witt, Rovelli, Foran have all been scuppered, each without even
PLAYING FIRST GRADE this year (unbelievable, you contract them for a year, don't even play them and then shaft them?!!!!!!!!!)%(T%)*T@(%T*@%(^*@)T@), and there's this article that claims Kemp won't see the end of his contract out? People will flame me for the player-hate I have for Lillyman, its not just that he's a poor player, a never was and a never will be, but its also because now we find ourselves in a position where Leeson Ah Mau is being let go (sure they couldn't meet terms with him but how much money is Lillyman getting that could have been used??%(%%), then you have Stacey Jones and one of my first comments was well I hope that Stacey doesn't get in the way of Liam Foran who when he signed the contract said he expected to be in first grade and it conferred a very confident young man who truly believed in his abilities to drive the team around. Stacey as an assistant coach was great, but to me its like getting Tony Iro and Dean Bell into the centres for 2010.
Thankfully, we have those couple of chestnuts from management to ease our minds:-
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/league/news/article.cfm?c_id=79&objectid=10581145
Hallaluejah! No one wants to come here. Could it be that players don't want to go to a club across the ditch away from their families when there's a precedence of player dissatisfaction and management cutting contracts? Could it be that perhaps the club need to look at its aimless recruitment policies and also how it manages the players it has? How on earth any club can openly come out and say they're happy with how Stacey is going is beyond me. Could it be that players are sceptical about going to a club as a young bloke when the Warriors will probably just pull a 40 year old out of retirement to play in his position for nostalgia sakes?
Frankly, Grant Rovelli and Michael Witt were better halves, and even I, yes, even I, am starting to think the treatment of Witt, while not necessarily a top performer, is pretty rancid. This club is going to be paying overs out its rear to get good players here for a long long time, and frankly I begin to wonder whether Mick Watson was really that bad.