I want him punished for actively promoting a rival code...
What promotion has he done for the AFL? All he has done is sign a contract and confirm that he has signed a contract.
He is not an AFL employee yet. He has not done any promotion work for them yet.
He may in the future have intent to promote AFL but he has not yet done the act and joined AFL. All he has done is a sign a contract. You can crystal ball gaze and tell me he will perform it? The only time you punish someone for intent with no action is attempt and conspiracy. There has been no attempt to promote a rival code as we know of yet thus the rubicon has not yet been crossed- and publicly telling your employer you're leaving is no conspiracy! Maybe if he signed surreptitiously and tried to take players with him from Qld league team I could understand your point. But he has not.
shorty said:
If Folau was banned, it's taking a stand
A stand against what? People leaving for double pay? Are you serious?
"Oh I won't leave for 3.6 million - I might get dropped from rep games THIS YEAR - oh wait - I'm leaving for three years, so really its just 4 years of rep games I miss for 3.6 million".
If those rep games were really that important he would have stayed in league. The only stand you would be taking is cutting off your nose to spite your face. He's currently vicariously an NRL employee on the payroll - and you're making him work. By letting him leave early - you're not taking a stand - you're showing weakness by giving a paid holiday.
voltron said:
you actively promote a major competitor in any company
and you will be fired and let go
Yeah that would be a breach of contract and your current employer could cancel the contract thus terminating employment and may even seek damages. What promotion for the AFL has Israel done thus far? None. You make no point.
voltron said:
not invited to the annual company overseas conference
Because you're leaving? Rational employers take staff who are departing on conferences and get as much good work out of them as they can until they leave. You have to pay them anyway - if they're prepared to work out the term let them
voltron said:
and its pathetic that QLD did this backflip
Never changed your mind before?
voltron said:
after several people came out and said they wouldnt pick him and would support him being picked
Never regretted an emotional decision in the heat of the moment that you later changed when logic took hold?
voltron said:
no credibility and no integrity
You're seriously not comparing this to changing striking laws one hour before Hayne appears at the judiciary. That is the definition of no credibility or integrity. Changing the rules to save one key player is arbitrary and capricious. But thats the way NSW always have been.
For the people that say Origin is a privilege. So is club selection! There are no rights to selection for the players. If they get picked they have to play unless injured or they are in breach of their contract. All Qrl has done is make him do more work before leaving.
You make origin sound like a gift. Its not. Its an opportunity to do higher profile work with a bonus pay. Like desirable overtime you are contractually forced to accept unless you're over 30. Just because the players enjoy it does not mean its not work.