some people are just looking at this decision with a very narrow perspective, its not just a matter of picking him or droping him for the reasons which we have already heard ten times over.
But take this into consideration...
Anyone involved in team QLD also want to make sure that team preperations and moral are just right leading into the game ,so having said that -when the team themselves come before selectors and say "we want to play beside izzy" its then a matter of appeasing the requests of the players for the sake of team confidence and morality leading to the big game more so than doing Folau any favours however he wouldnt be there if his playing was rubbish either depite what the other players wanted.
teams like playing beside particular players one player that comes to mind is Michael croker, its been noted previously that players have expressed their wants and needs of having him in their side, so thier decision to put Folau in that same light is not somthing they do lightly ,there is a reason why they want Folau and its not somthing that many of us can understand since we are not the ones on the field beside him.
so we can complain all we want but players opinions are considered stronly because all politics aside when it comes to the crunch and its game day the players are the ones who need to do the job and they want a specific player ,who are we to complain or argue with that?
