What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Game Future NRL Stadiums part II

jim_57

Moderator
Staff member
Messages
4,602
That bid looks quite silly now, doesn’t it.

Yehp, half of them ovals. Townsville got a better deal than that plan to rebuild Dairy Farmers. SFS rebuild not included, Stadium Australia rectangular rebuild not included either. Blacktown would have probably meant Commbank not being built and who would play there afterwards? Canberra would have been a better than nothing compromise, still in the same location.

Newcastle plan looked alright though.

Somehow AFL would have been the winners out of that bid getting new/upgraded stadiums in Perth (happened anyway), Gold Coast & Geelong. Probably would have found a way to get Blacktown as an oval for GWS as well.
 

Perth Red

Post Whore
Messages
69,520
There’s actually nothing in fifas stadium requirement document that excludes ovals, I’m sure it’s not preferable to them but they don’t exclude them.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,554
Yehp, half of them ovals. Townsville got a better deal than that plan to rebuild Dairy Farmers. SFS rebuild not included, Stadium Australia rectangular rebuild not included either. Blacktown would have probably meant Commbank not being built and who would play there afterwards? Canberra would have been a better than nothing compromise, still in the same location.

Newcastle plan looked alright though.

Somehow AFL would have been the winners out of that bid getting new/upgraded stadiums in Perth (happened anyway), Gold Coast & Geelong. Probably would have found a way to get Blacktown as an oval for GWS as well.
So sad how rugby league can’t get results out of governments like our afl rivals can
 

Canard

Immortal
Messages
35,600
No it doesn't.
Blatter said the stand-out reason Australia was never seriously considered as a host was because its location made it unattractive for TV broadcasters and therefore FIFA revenue streams.
“You never had a chance because you were never going to be competitive for the broadcasters,” Blatter said


 
Messages
12,482
There’s actually nothing in fifas stadium requirement document that excludes ovals, I’m sure it’s not preferable to them but they don’t exclude them.
You’re right but I think that’s because it’s a non issue everywhere but here. We’re unique in that we’re the only country where an oval is better suited to a dominant, rival football code which FIFA might see it being at odds with their legacy requirements.
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,002
You’re right but I think that’s because it’s a non issue everywhere but here. We’re unique in that we’re the only country where an oval is better suited to a dominant, rival football code which FIFA might see it being at odds with their legacy requirements.
Yeah thats very true, other than Great Britain and New Zealand, ovals aren't really that much of a draw card round the world... .maybe add india
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,002
FIFA say Australia is no chance because of the timezone for broadcasters but allowed Japan to host 🤔🤔🤔 Something fishy about FIFA as usual
Not the timezone, the broadcasters themselves, imagine theyd be more cashed up entities elsewhere in the world, rather than channel 7 and sbs
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,554
“The failed bid for the 2022 men’s tournament held in Qatar cost taxpayers $46m and was widely criticised after it attracted just one vote from Fifa’s decision-makers. However, Johnson said the success of the Women’s World Cup means another bid is now worth considering.”
 
Messages
12,482
No doubt our time zone is inconvenient for the majority of the football powerhouse nations but it seems they still tuned in. So FIFA will have to look for another excuse.


 

Yosemite Sam

Juniors
Messages
770
There’s actually nothing in fifas stadium requirement document that excludes ovals, I’m sure it’s not preferable to them but they don’t exclude them.
Incorrect. Fifa has very strict guidelines on which stadiums can be used for World Cup matches . This includes how far the seats are from the centre of the pitch. If any seats fall outside this distance the stadium is ineligible to host matches.

This is why the MCG, and every other cricket oval will never be compliant.
 

Wb1234

Immortal
Messages
33,554
Incorrect. Fifa has very strict guidelines on which stadiums can be used for World Cup matches . This includes how far the seats are from the centre of the pitch. If any seats fall outside this distance the stadium is ineligible to host matches.

This is why the MCG, and every other cricket oval will never be compliant.
How did Eden park pass
 

MugaB

Coach
Messages
15,002
“The failed bid for the 2022 men’s tournament held in Qatar cost taxpayers $46m and was widely criticised after it attracted just one vote from Fifa’s decision-makers. However, Johnson said the success of the Women’s World Cup means another bid is now worth considering.”
That still doesn't change the fact our broadcasters are low scale and fifa want broadcasters that can pay the astronomical amount they are used to, its the very reason we were never considered a decade ago, the chairman of fifa even pointed that out
 

Latest posts

Top