Luai Burton it is then.
That is an amended breach notice, it says he is facing a two match ban, it hasnt been handed down yet. If you click on the link it says further down that both players have an opportunity to respond before a final determination is made.
You are probably right, however my point is, a decision has not as yet been handed down.How do you defend it though? So both will miss 2 games
It doesn’t seem equitable when you look at the illegal acts of Latrell and his mates who won’t miss a match.
They wont be penalised further. The NRL will happily forget all about it.They haven’t been penalised for the gun issue yet as it’s before the courts.
They wont be penalised further. The NRL will happily forget all about it.
The NRL doesnt seem to care about players breaking the law unless women are involved. Even before proven guilty that's when they stand players down. Or have the toughest punishments.
Cleary deserved a harsher punishment than he initially received. But JAC and Mitchell also deserved a harsher initial punishment than Cleary for mine. Cleary lying deserved further punishment to at worst match Mitchell and KJAC.
He deserved more tbh. If he had of just admitted the full truth the first time he wouldn't of been punished worse then Latrell and JAC, but that blatant lying to everyone is terrible.
EDIT: And Tyrone May is f**king lucky he is Nathans best mate, 7 games from the intergrity unit this season plus all of last season, what a waste of space he has become.
If you have a CCTV with audio....If a tree falls in the forest and no-one sees or hears it, did it really happen?