You clearly are geniused. I thought you blokes would be happy because Humphreys has come out and told you all precisely what his position is, despite the fact it hasn't changed since day one. At no point did Humphreys say he wanted to keep Moltzen. The only point of contention is that Moltzen didn't get a formal release. Please point out the backflips, because if you look at the facts, you'll see none.
No need for insults.
If indeed Humphreys hasn't changed his position, why all the drama over the release? Is he doing it just for sh*ts and giggles, to get his name in the papers and annoy the Dragons? There is no other explanation for it - and clearly the entire rugby league community, except you, believes Humphreys has attempted to backflip on their original decision to release the kid. Otherwise, it's a completely moot point.
Funnily enough though, despite whinging to begin with in July, he didn't say a word until his preferred halfback for 2012 was charged for allegedly assaulting his girlfriend, again. Suddenly the Tigers look like being without a halfback for 2012 and arguably their next best option "hasn't officially been released" despite admissions from the coach and other Tigers staff 3 months ago that the entire club was aware of his contract situation going forward.
Absolute arrogance and petulance from the Tigers.
