Russell Crowe's Band
Referee
- Messages
- 21,952
so shit
like. i mean..what if theres nothing to see here?
just f**ked the season royally
like. i mean..what if theres nothing to see here?
just f**ked the season royally
Imagine how the players must be feeling. No matter what happens now I don't see us challenging at all this year. f**king sad really.
so shit
like. i mean..what if theres nothing to see here?
just f**ked the season royally
Finished before it's begun.so shit
like. i mean..what if theres nothing to see here?
just f**ked the season royally
These are good questions Click. Ive been pondering them as well, trying to put myself in the shoes of the investigators. Of the 6 clubs named we are probably the least controversial in some ways. We have no major sponsor as yet so the investigation won't taint other affiliates, we had the least exposure to Danks, and we maybe the team that has the smallest supporter base so the outcry wont be as large as say the Hartleys. he development is approved and going ahead so any financial pain might be short lived. My workings with gov't have shown that they start with the easiest tasks first. I just cant get beyond the lack of clarity in all this. Im sticking by da management. They saved us last year and have good form.Why us and why now?
What about the other clubs mentioned..??
Or are they next ???
Ive got a brilliant idea. Maybe one of the hundreds of reporters who are reading this thread. This ones for you.
Now it has been reported that a FORMER INVESTIGATOR of the ASADA spoke to the players. I take it the FORMER INVESTIGATOR would not be under the rules and regs of the current investigators on the ASADA payroll.
Why dont they find out who this investigator was and ask him a few questions. I thought thats what investigative journalist do.
Drop the burbons dude and dudettes. Chase that story.
Sharks 46
Titans 4
Its official, we are going to be stripped of our premierships due to our involvement in the drug scandal.
As long as they don't take our Amco Cup!
These are good questions Click. Ive been pondering them as well, trying to put myself in the shoes of the investigators. Of the 6 clubs named we are probably the least controversial in some ways. We have no major sponsor as yet so the investigation won't taint other affiliates, we had the least exposure to Danks, and we maybe the team that has the smallest supporter base so the outcry wont be as large as say the Hartleys. he development is approved and going ahead so any financial pain might be short lived. My workings with gov't have shown that they start with the easiest tasks first. I just cant get beyond the lack of clarity in all this. Im sticking by da management. They saved us last year and have good form.