Hoppa is a great player and I must admit I love watching him and he is still so young could be the best centre in the game in a couple years the way he is going.
No they weren't and if memory serves me correctly, the very first of these texts were written around a whole 50 to 200 years after his supposed demise.
You're an idiot. There were professional scribes everywhere in those days, and not one of them thought it warranted a sentence or two to note that there was this great healer/miracle man who was sticking to the establishment authority.
Like I said you guys are delusional fools.
Like some of you other mob have said, there's more historical evidence that Jesus lived and did extraordinary things than there is evidence that Julius Ceasar existed. Another interesting thing to note is that Jesus said some pretty shocking things about himself, so much that the religious leaders of the time wanted him dead. When they killed him, the blokes that were following him became a bunch of scaredy cats and went into hiding. One of his most loyal followers even denied knowing him for fear they'd kill him too.
Then something happened to turn these timid guys that were in hiding into bold men that were willing to die (and a few of them were killed) to tell others about Jesus. The influence of these few blokes has turned into a pretty huge group called Christians; and yes there's many types of Christians that agree and disagree about a heap of things, but most agree on a few key things about him. Much like we're a group of people that follow a footy team that have blue and gold jerseys. We all have different reasons for following them and we also disagree about a heap of stuff to do with them, but at the end of the day, we love the Eels and all love them to win games and hope they'll win the comp sometime soon.
G
Would you care to cite any of that evidence? I mean, I'm pretty sure he existed, but this claim that there is more evidence than there is for Caeasar? Seriously?
...So he [Ananus, son of Ananus the high priest] assembled the sanhedrin of judges, and brought before him the brother of Jesus, who was called Christ, whose name was James, and some others (or some of his companions) and when he had formed an accusation against them, he delivered them to be stoned.
...Christus, from whom the name [i.e. Christianity] had its origin, suffered the extreme penalty during the reign of tiberius at the hands of one of our procurators, Pontius Pilatus...
Some of the ridiculous posts on here trying to justify your imaginary friend is just total dumb arse.
Faith is not prof of anything. Give a skerrick of evidence or just stop crapping on.
Some of the ridiculous posts on here trying to justify your imaginary friend is just total dumb arse.
Faith is not prof of anything. Give a skerrick of evidence or just stop crapping on.
Some of the ridiculous posts on here trying to justify your imaginary friend is just total dumb arse.
Faith is not prof of anything. Give a skerrick of evidence or just stop crapping on.
None of us will know what happens after we die until Pou tells us.
Some of the ridiculous posts on here trying to justify your imaginary friend is just total dumb arse.
Faith is not prof of anything. Give a skerrick of evidence or just stop crapping on.
Sorry to keep banging on, Barry asked me to cite a couple of pieces of evidence.
Hey Barry,
Without getting into it too much, here's a couple of historian's writings corroborating the existence of Jesus.
(Flavius Josephus, first century Jewish historian)
(Cornelius Tacitus, first century historian)
There's really no debate that he existed and was well known for his teaching and actions. But that's not the confronting or contentious thing about it all. The question is - was he/is he who he said he was?
And if you look at what he was reported to have said, it's worth asking was he a liar, a lunatic or was he really the son of God as he claimed to be?
Just to be clear after Lingards nice words, I am a Christian, but I'd hate for you mob to feel like I was bible-bashing you. You're all big enough and ugly enough to make up your own minds; even Ram.
G
Sorry to keep banging on, Barry asked me to cite a couple of pieces of evidence.
Hey Barry,
Without getting into it too much, here's a couple of historian's writings corroborating the existence of Jesus.
(Flavius Josephus, first century Jewish historian)
(Cornelius Tacitus, first century historian)
There's really no debate that he existed and was well known for his teaching and actions. But that's not the confronting or contentious thing about it all. The question is - was he/is he who he said he was?
And if you look at what he was reported to have said, it's worth asking was he a liar, a lunatic or was he really the son of God as he claimed to be?
Just to be clear after Lingards nice words, I am a Christian, but I'd hate for you mob to feel like I was bible-bashing you. You're all big enough and ugly enough to make up your own minds; even Ram.
G
It will have something to do with LBA's I'm sure of it.None of us will know what happens after we die until Pou tells us.