The argument is NOT about different views about what racism is. What's considered racist is subjective and you need to understand that. Racism is not a complex term which involves scholars and research... that's why I'm finding it so hard to comprehend your posts. Racism is very simple as term and doesn't need any studying or research to look into what is a very very simple term. All these scholars you're talking about, I don't know what they're looking into and researching but they're wasting their time if all they are doing is looking into getting a proper definition of what 'racism' refers to. These scholars you're talking about may be very intelligent people, but you can't just change definitions based on your OWN opinions, agendas and research and expect everyone to just accept it because you say so. We're not talking about scientific theories here where A=B one day, but then with a bit more research we find out A=C. We're talking about society and culture which is dependent on not just the opinion of a few scholars, but the entire society whom we are part of.
I know, we're dependent on people like you - who think that just because we as Australians aren't walking up to Aboriginals and saying, hey f**k you black merkin- we're not racist.
Ones that think it's possible for Aboriginals to be racist against white people just because they don't like us, or they shout names at us when we walk past, even though they have nothing in today's society and will most likely die 20 years before us.
It's not simple, racism is the most complex problem in the world (so many wars, genocide etc), these academics are researching it and explaining it to convey to people that it's not just as simple as people think it is - to try to change Australia for the better.
Hellteam, I think you're misunderstanding what racism is. By your logic, an affluent race cannot be discriminated against. It doesn't make sense. An act can be called racism regardless of the victims position in society. My cousin works at a primary school and Aboriginal students were able to get their own photo together along with the photo of the whole student group. Why couldn't the Middle Eastern or African or Caucasion students have a photo together? There is no doubt that the other children in this instance would have felt inferior to the Aborginals.
If you read my posts before I argued that minorities (Aboriginals) could racially abuse others, but they wouldn't be considered truly racist. Pete Cash up there just reiterated my point about how they don't have the social position to be properly racist.
Aka Anthony Mundine: the original question in the thread.