You said the nrl needs to be NationalAnd what does that have to do with Perth NRL side? I didn't even mention AFL.
I responded it’s international
it’s already surpassed little national borders
the reality is we tried a club in Perth it failed
You said the nrl needs to be NationalAnd what does that have to do with Perth NRL side? I didn't even mention AFL.
Have you ever left your suburb?You said the nrl needs to be National
I responded it’s international
it’s already surpassed little national borders
the reality is we tried a club in Perth it failed
The force were dumped not long ago & gws only exists because league is willing to foot bill
Buddy I’ve been to over 1k rugby league games including going to England just to watch rugby leagueHave you ever left your suburb?
His point is that norths Balmain Illawarra etc didn’t fail either and if given another chance now will prosperBeing dumped from a competition is different to folding because they can’t make ends meet.
Your second example; well if fumbleball have the money to do that then that’s their choice. I would argue a second team in a market is a lot different to one team in a market in any case. Essentially your point would be valid if we were arguing for a second team in Melbourne which we aren’t.
The league is that flush with funds at the moment that no team is going to die, so long as those teams are in Australia and New Zealand. You could argue for anything: another Sydney team, another team in Queensland, another team in New Zealand, Adelaide, Perth. None of them would fold.
I don't think he's ever left his psych ward.Have you ever left your suburb?
His point is that norths Balmain Illawarra etc didn’t fail either and if given another chance now will prosper
that’s what you’ve all missed
More potatoes in here than a packet of Smiths Crisps.Potato
His point is that norths Balmain Illawarra etc didn’t fail either and if given another chance now will prosper
that’s what you’ve all missed
I think this is a response to norths bashingNo he isn’t, he is arguing the complete opposite. In fact I am the one arguing that they could put a side in most places in Australia and New Zealand and they would survive (I wouldn’t say ‘prosper’ because that is a very loaded term - for example they could put in another side in Sydney and it would survive. It wouldn’t prosper though and there is no point in doing it)
He is stating that because Perth folded in 1997 he is inferring that they would fail again (it could possibly happen again but anything could possibly happen). To essentially draw a line on something because of extraordinary circumstances that happened 25 years ago doesn’t make much sense. Imagine if the world operated like that?
Also the framing of say Perth or Adelaide not being in the competition anymore as a failure but at the same time arguing that Norths or Illawarra isn’t is tiresome. It is also completely hypocritical. They were all cut because they were considered expendable, however right or wrong those decisions are or were.
I think this is a response to norths bashing
the collective wisdom of this forum is to see the elimination of norths as sad but much needed rationalisation
whilst poor Perth were saddled unfairly with travel costs by the arlc then must be added again and given another chance because people want to copy afl
I agree that you could put a club just about anywhere now and they would do fairly well with the way clubs are funded it’s a game changer
Well if the bears do come back via Perth it’s going to be hilariousPerhaps. It is a fact though that the game couldn’t afford a 22 team competition at the time and whatever decision was made was going to upset a whole lot of people.
Nevertheless what happened is what happened and it doesn’t really help the future of the game or every discussion about it to be framed by the Super League war or the context of that period.
Being dumped from a competition is different to folding because they can’t make ends meet.
Your second example; well if fumbleball have the money to do that then that’s their choice. I would argue a second team in a market is a lot different to one team in a market in any case. Essentially your point would be valid if we were arguing for a second team in Melbourne which we aren’t.
The league is that flush with funds at the moment that no team is going to die, so long as those teams are in Australia and New Zealand. You could argue for anything: another Sydney team, another team in Queensland, another team in New Zealand, Adelaide, Perth. None of them would fold.
I’m not suggesting we are ready, far from it. But nor am I suggesting we have nothing like some ill informed on here. It’s interesting with sg ball not returning this year, not seen anything put out by nrlwa as to why and I’ve asked them. It’s an expensive model and tbf the returns are questionable without somewhere for them to progress to. Maybe they decided not a great current investment just to train western force players!
When expansion clubs fails it’s not counted );Expansion club folding is failing. Lol, ppl here trying to talk way around truth.
Tell me how lions needed bailing out ten years ago if you think single city teams can't fail?!!
How about a heartland club 'folding? Is that failure as well?Expansion club folding is failing. Lol, ppl here trying to talk way around truth.
Tell me how lions needed bailing out ten years ago if you think single city teams can't fail?!!
trolls backUr full of bs; telling us there's 40k footballers in wa when only 4k are registered & huge support base for the sport despite 4k watching game on tv.
Lol, every now & then somebody run ins & destroys you with truth bombs..
..can't even acknowledge the fact that reds expansion failed in past
Yes because I find News Ltd are always making great decisions that benefit the game the most lolWhen expansion clubs fails it’s not counted );
only for Sydney clubs
literally news ltd could keep Cronulla or Perth
they killed off Perth
In 2000 all of the non-Sydney clubs generated more money from game day than all of the Sydney clubs.
While the three Sydney clubs who had aligned with Super League – Canterbury, Penrith and Cronulla – were considered the most profitable, every non-Sydney club produced larger gate receipts than their Sydney rivals.What will it take for a Sydney club to consider relocation?
If a team from England is brave enough to relocate to Canada, what will it take for a Sydney club to secure their future by moving to Brisbane or Perth?www.nrl.com
Broncos and Cowboys earn significantly more from sponsorship and corporate hospitality than all of the Sydney clubs.
Revenue for NRL Clubs (2018-2021)
Sponsorship and Corporate Hospitality Club 2021 2020 2019 2018 Broncos $12,757,777 $10,310,407 $15,326,071 $14,572,909 Cowboys $8,986,580 $6,451,208 $9,382,117 $9,000,000? Rabbitohs $8,900,000 $6,000,000 $8,900,000 $7,900,000 Roosters $8,197,752...forums.leagueunlimited.com
trolls back
26k Touch participants
4100 registered players
10k RL experience participants
Oh yeh baby, RL is alive and well and growing.
Disagree.
We lost SG Ball during COVID and there is no hint of it returning. What is excuse is there for not having it this season just commenced? The word from within the NRL (whilst we had SG Ball) was they were already considering flogging us off and getting players to do an American style combine to push talent East.
It's great that we are having regional championships at different age groups across the summer, but it hasn't stop kids doing Fusion/Pride/Dolphins etc. moving straight back to union for the winter months.
There is no continuous high performance training across the juniors at the level required to compete at HM or SG Ball level. Half the kids that were previously rocking up for Pirates trials had barely seen the inside of the gym, skills are poor and physical condition extremely sub-par.
I don't mean to be negative but we can't put our head in the sand and pretend we are ready.