What's new
The Front Row Forums

Register a free account today to become a member of the world's largest Rugby League discussion forum! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jared Maxwell

Messages
22,023
so yeah. should have had a scrum.

5 tackles maybe and a kick, or a direct feed to attempt....

could have been anything.

not a penalty against us.
 

snickers007

Juniors
Messages
1,665
what i would have liked to have seen was this.

Gallen go up and say to the ref.

"are you sure. are you 100 percent sure. have a think about it, its a hot day...mistakes get made. take a second and think about what just occured. this can be fixed."

Referee would have said 'sorry - decision has been made. Unless the other ref / touchies / video ref have some foul play to report, I can't change my decision, regardless of how wrong it is'.

You'll often see chasers chasing from in front of the kicker - it's fine as long as they are 10m from the receiving fullback.

Not necessarily correct - if chasers are in front of kicker, and in front of the point of the play the ball when the kicked ball travels past the point of the play the ball - they are 'downtown' and can be penalised at the point of the play the ball.

Never enforced mind you - but technically, you need to be behind the play the ball as the ball is kicked past you.
 

firechild

First Grade
Messages
8,069
Why is this important?

From the link above:
It is important to make clear that at the end of the game or at any time during the game, there was no conversation between Sharks officials and the referees.
 

gronkathon

First Grade
Messages
9,266
I think it is raised because Flanagans post match press conference suggested that he had talked to the video reff for his opinion on the double movement o try
 

Valheru

Coach
Messages
19,568
The penalty call was definitely incorrect.

I am not sure what Flannagan is going on about with the double movement though. That was the definition of a double movement and the right call was made.
 

gronkathon

First Grade
Messages
9,266
Alot of stuff was missed.

Eg: Benji gets hit late and not in a tackling motion and no penalty whereas Cooper got penalised when Princess dived the night before.

It is good though that thy can admit mistakes. Now just to make sure they dont happen again
 

Frailty

First Grade
Messages
9,460
Admits referee AND touch judge got it wrong...






.... Next week they are still in first grade.

Nothing changes.
 

firechild

First Grade
Messages
8,069
It is good though that thy can admit mistakes. Now just to make sure they dont happen again

Would be good if that was the case but unfortunately almost all mistakes that have been admitted to in the Official View have been repeated time and time again. In this case they may actually learn from it but in 99% of cases nothing changes.
 

Izz

Bench
Messages
3,999
http://www.nrl.com/referees-stood-down/tabid/10874/newsid/66127/default.aspx
Maxwell and touchie dropped for R2.

Salt, meet Wound...

NRL Referees coaches Stuart Raper and Bill Harrigan have today made it clear that Match Officials will be accountable for performances, standing down referee Jared Maxwell and touch judge Jason Walsh from Round 2 Telstra Premiership matches.

In their weekly review of key decisions on NRL.com, the referees coaches declared the Match Officials incorrectly penalised the Sharks for off-side following a charge-down in golden-point.

“We are not going to drop every referee who makes a mistake but this is a mistake that clearly should not have been made and the circumstances of this decision warrant the action we have taken,” Harrigan said.

“The rule on a charge-down is that all players are deemed to be back on-side by the act of a charge-down. In this case, the referee got a call from his touch judge that the Sharks players were in front of the kicker and then became involved in the play. The referee then penalised them for this infringement.

“That decision was incorrect. The players were no longer offside due to the act of the charge-down. The touch judge and the referee got that decision wrong.

“The ruling should have been a knock-on against Wests Tigers’ Benji Marshall and a scrum feed to Cronulla.

“We have looked at the eagle-cam today and it proved that the Wests Tigers players were on-side in their attempt to charge the ball down, so there was no problem there. But the simple fact is that the Sharks players were put back on-side due to the charge-down and should not have been penalised.”

Harrigan was equally adamant that the Match Officials were correct in penalising the Sharks’ Colin Best for a double-movement earlier in the match.

“There is no doubt that the Match Officials made the correct call when they ruled no try for a double-movement involving Colin Best, that call was 100 per cent correct,” Harrigan said.

“Colin Best’s arm carrying the ball hits the ground, his momentum stops and then there is a second effort to get the ball over the line. At no stage does the tackler drop off him, so the tackle was correctly deemed complete.

“There is no grey area with this ruling, it is a clear double-movement.”

Harrigan said it was also important to make clear that at the end of the game or at any time during the game, there was no conversation or contact between Sharks officials and the Match Officials.
 
Last edited:

Izz

Bench
Messages
3,999
CAPTION TIME!

Robbie+Farah+Jared+Maxwell+NRL+Rd+6+Wests+2FC2J7KJgjnl.jpg
"Listen, Robbie, the best way to sell a dive is..."
 

Latest posts

Top