Poupou Escobar
Post Whore
- Messages
- 91,333
He was pretty good against the Storm in round one.Has Hodgson progressively gotten worse as the season has gone on?
He was pretty good against the Storm in round one.Has Hodgson progressively gotten worse as the season has gone on?
He wasn't. His performance was just viewed through the prism of a returning cripple.He was pretty good against the Storm in round one.
His best game was round 1, he’s got progressively worse since.Has Hodgson progressively gotten worse as the season has gone on?
The fact the club thought having Rein and Hodgeson on the books was a bad idea...
Hodgson uses emojis to rattle Raiders for Canberra return
"He's a funny man and a massive prankster, but hopefully he's not laughing on Saturday."www.canberratimes.com.au
What emoji's is Hodgson sending to raiders players.
Himself in a walking frame
Check his stats: https://www.parraeels.com.au/draw/nrl-premiership/2023/round-1-eels-v-storm/He wasn't. His performance was just viewed through the prism of a returning cripple.
He was pretty good against the Storm in round one.
Watch the game instead... oh, we already did.
they were only just recently taken off the spam list
I just realised something that would explain so much...you have never actually watched Hodgson play, have you?
The stats reflect what happened during the game, without your flawed memory and all your biases clouding it.Watch the game instead... oh, we already did.
I've seen him play heaps, including before he came to Parra. He was always slow.I just realised something that would explain so much...you have never actually watched Hodgson play, have you?
Its a shame, because if you had you would see how diabolically terrible and slow in attack AND defence he is...
Yeah... nah. Stats are stats, good for dumbed down aggregate summarising or hypothetical surmising only.The stats reflect what happened during the game, without your flawed memory and all your biases clouding it.
*mammoriesThat was a pisstake obviously. You know I'm into stats. They are far more reliable than your memory.
Or does it just reinforce their confirmation bias? The thing you're expecting to see is a deceptive passenger, and it is easy to fall into the trap of regarding it as 'relevant context'.Yeah... nah. Stats are stats, good for dumbed down aggregate summarising or hypothetical surmising only.
Watching what happened play by play, moment by moment gives anyone/everyone the direct experience of what happened with the relevant context.
Penisini ti KumI think I know what you where thinking. Imagine his name was
Chan Tong Kum
Imagine that. Chan tong Kum with an explosive charge.
Yeah we lost nothing when Lussick was dummy half deputy for Reed.See if Joey Lussick is homesick yet.