
NRL 2022, Judiciary Report, Latest charges and suspension news from Match Review Committee | Dragons
See all the latest judiciary, charges and suspension news from the 2022 NRL Telstra Premiership.

I really thought that the Judiciary would grade Sua and Ramien charges the same. Both grade one or grade two. Ramien looked worse. IMO nothing has changed with Judiciary despite some form of off season review and the usual angst and suspicion over how gradings occur lingers on. Are fans able to read how and why the Judiciary marks each case cited? Charge gradings determine which teams make the semis and which don’t ; more than you think. Grade two lose the player next week or more / grade one no big deal just a fine. You make your own opinion?
Sua is very important to us this year. He has been playing well when not put in the bin for minor matters. Ramien is very important to sharks. Look what happened when he was binned last night in last 7 minutes or so. One dragons try scored and a professional foul by Fifita stopped a second try 4 minutes later ( why no penalty try I don’t know ).
I’m just over it. Silly fans why go to games to watch strange adjudications when you can stay home and just turn off the game for a movie ?
Obviously Su'a is a Dragons player. He and Moose and Fui will be the ones the MRC and judiciary will be monitoring in every game they play from now on. They will take great delight in banning our players because they just don't like us. It is as simple as that.The commentators were saying Sua was unlucky again. Possibly a penalty but not a sin bin. And, here he is facing a suspension, yet Ramien, whose tackle was worse, is looking at a fine.
My gob is smacked.
Unbelievable isn’t it. First player to pretend to be injured from an opponent’s tackle in the very next game is sent for HIA assessment, for foxing!!!Obviously Su'a is a Dragons player. He and Moose and Fui will be the ones the MRC and judiciary will be monitoring in every game they play from now on. They will take great delight in banning our players because they just don't like us. It is as simple as that.
I didn't see the Ramien incident but if it was worse than Su'a's and his grading was less than Su'a's then I give up.
I detest the way we are being treated. I know that we are not angels, but we do cop it the most nowadays.
What about teflon Pangai Jnr (in a Bulldogs jersey) from having 2 goes at Haas's head last weekThe commentators were saying Sua was unlucky again. Possibly a penalty but not a sin bin. And, here he is facing a suspension, yet Ramien, whose tackle was worse, is looking at a fine.
My gob is smacked.
I still love going to games live and or watch on TV, especially Dragons. I cant resist. I just cant. I must watch. I am worse trying not to watch Dragons games or try to look at the result first time after F/T like a caged lion. its worseI really thought that the Judiciary would grade Sua and Ramien charges the same. Both grade one or grade two. Ramien looked worse. IMO nothing has changed with Judiciary despite some form of off season review and the usual angst and suspicion over how gradings occur lingers on. Are fans able to read how and why the Judiciary marks each case cited? Charge gradings determine which teams make the semis and which don’t ; more than you think. Grade two lose the player next week or more / grade one no big deal just a fine. You make your own opinion?
Sua is very important to us this year. He has been playing well when not put in the bin for minor matters. Ramien is very important to sharks. Look what happened when he was binned last night in last 7 minutes or so. One dragons try scored and a professional foul by Fifita stopped a second try 4 minutes later ( why no penalty try I don’t know ).
I’m just over it. Silly fans why go to games to watch strange adjudications when you can stay home and just turn off the game for a movie ?
Or, better yet, watch the AFL.I really thought that the Judiciary would grade Sua and Ramien charges the same. Both grade one or grade two. Ramien looked worse. IMO nothing has changed with Judiciary despite some form of off season review and the usual angst and suspicion over how gradings occur lingers on. Are fans able to read how and why the Judiciary marks each case cited? Charge gradings determine which teams make the semis and which don’t ; more than you think. Grade two lose the player next week or more / grade one no big deal just a fine. You make your own opinion?
Sua is very important to us this year. He has been playing well when not put in the bin for minor matters. Ramien is very important to sharks. Look what happened when he was binned last night in last 7 minutes or so. One dragons try scored and a professional foul by Fifita stopped a second try 4 minutes later ( why no penalty try I don’t know ).
I’m just over it. Silly fans why go to games to watch strange adjudications when you can stay home and just turn off the game for a movie ?
Well said NOTB.Or, better yet, watch the AFL.
After watching the latest installment of "Leagues greatest rivalry"(TM) I turned over to the AFL and caught Lance Franklin's momentous 1000th goal and the outpouring of affection for the guy from thousands of jubilant supporters sharing the historic moment. I haven't experienced or witnessed anything like that in league since 2010 or, further back, the "Changa"chant in the Brisbane test in 1974(?).
The NRL is a shape-shifting monster - the rules change every four minutes (and even then are selectively applied), a club jersey has become a billboard with a number on it. Everything about the packaging of it rubs me the wrong way. The AFL board seem to actually *like* and *understand* their game, dig the tribalism and know what the punters want - not because they held a survey, but because the game has an acknowledged level of cultural significance.
Last night the SCG - the spiritual home of Rugby League in Sydney, the venue of historic tests and Grand Finals until 1988 - was practically levitating on the buzz of the relocated South Melbourne Swans who are now no longer invaders from the south. They now *own* Sydney. And the NRL only have themselves to blame.
Yes the NRL, are a f..cking joke.....Well said NOTB.
The Changa Chant was in Sydney in 1974.The 3rd and Deciding Test - where Changa as Captain and Coach of Australia ,became the first man to score more than 100 Points against the POM's,which Australia won.The Changa Chant was heard,during and after the Match at the SCG.Or, better yet, watch the AFL.
After watching the latest installment of "Leagues greatest rivalry"(TM) I turned over to the AFL and caught Lance Franklin's momentous 1000th goal and the outpouring of affection for the guy from thousands of jubilant supporters sharing the historic moment. I haven't experienced or witnessed anything like that in league since 2010 or, further back, the "Changa"chant in the Brisbane test in 1974(?).
The NRL is a shape-shifting monster - the rules change every four minutes (and even then are selectively applied), a club jersey has become a billboard with a number on it. Everything about the packaging of it rubs me the wrong way. The AFL board seem to actually *like* and *understand* their game, dig the tribalism and know what the punters want - not because they held a survey, but because the game has an acknowledged level of cultural significance.
Last night the SCG - the spiritual home of Rugby League in Sydney, the venue of historic tests and Grand Finals until 1988 - was practically levitating on the buzz of the relocated South Melbourne Swans who are now no longer invaders from the south. They now *own* Sydney. And the NRL only have themselves to blame.
Cheers, Lawman.The Changa Chant was in Sydney in 1974.The 3rd and Deciding Test - where Changa as Captain and Coach of Australia ,became the first man to score more than 100 Points against the POM's,which Australia won.The Changa Chant was heard,during and after the Match at the SCG.
This is 100% spot-on. Their only consideration is the next broadcast deal. I agree that the current standard of refereeing is turning me off most games. It is also getting harder to watch the redv play. Thankfully the MRC, commentators and ref bias hasn't yet intruded on the Red V women's game.Yes the NRL, are a f..cking joke.....
They have an agenda.
It doesn't include the FANS.
The crowds are down,& it won't be long till Foxtel starts offering less money for TV rights, with audiences dropping off. I personally can't watch a game now, with referees orchestrating games to suit TV ratings. Won't be long we'll all have to watch AFL. MURDOCH is ruining our game.
Yes Murdoch has already stated, he likes AFL, he thinksThis is 100% spot-on. Their only consideration is the next broadcast deal. I agree that the current standard of refereeing is turning me off most games. It is also getting harder to watch the redv play. Thankfully the MRC, commentators and ref bias hasn't yet intruded on the Red V women's game.
I was on the hill that day.The Changa Chant was in Sydney in 1974.The 3rd and Deciding Test - where Changa as Captain and Coach of Australia ,became the first man to score more than 100 Points against the POM's,which Australia won.The Changa Chant was heard,during and after the Match at the SCG.
And he’s only been given a grade 1 so play on.Anybody see Solomona's effort last night? Third man in, shoulder to the back of the head .Two rules.
CCI was on the hill that day.
Unbelievable unlike the following year.
CC