Game_Breaker
Coach
- Messages
- 14,003
Ghoulies said:So going by this whole, 'Johns is the incumbent' theory, shouldn't he have been Blues captain?
Johns wasnt selected in game 1. same thing happend with Fittler last year
Ghoulies said:So going by this whole, 'Johns is the incumbent' theory, shouldn't he have been Blues captain?
Ghoulies said:So going by this whole, 'Johns is the incumbent' theory, shouldn't he have been Blues captain?
Ghoulies said:So going by this whole, 'Johns is the incumbent' theory, shouldn't he have been Blues captain?
Johns Magic said:Mate he may as well have been.
Even if Johns hasn't got the (C) next to his name for the Kangaroos you know he will be the one leading the team on the field.
Unlike Lockyer, Johns won't lie down and die when his team needs him.
No, it can contribute to show that he is a good leader.Razor said:So you think whoever has won the most games should be captain?
NPK said:No, it can contribute to show that he is a good leader.
NPK said:No, it can contribute to show that he is a good leader.
Really? The Broncos haven't got more than 3 tries in 'em without Lockyer.Johns Magic said:Mickey Mouse could captain that Broncos team and they'd still be top of the table.
Ghoulies said:Really? The Broncos haven't got more than 3 tries in 'em without Lockyer.
NPK said:What a coincidence. Newcastle supporters are the ones not wanting Lockyer to be captain.
Ghoulies said:So I take it you use stats because you don't actually watch them play?
I said after game 2 that Johns had taken back his mantle as the games premier player, but suggestions of Lockyer being a nuffy are ludicrous. Just look at the Broncos vs Eels, or Broncos vs Roosters; he had complete control over the game, yet he racked up something like 1 and 2 try assists respectively. Or even take a look at Origin 2, Lockyer made 2 try assists yet he definitely didn't have a happy game.
You're right, you didn't. But with comments like this you may aswell have....Where did I label him a nuffy?
A travesty? Buderus is a very good player, but like Lockyer(at 5/8), he is yet to do anything special at Origin level.To try to even compare Lockyer to Buderus let alone Joey Johns is a travesty
Why do you think that? Brisbanes forwards are good enough to give Lockyer enough room, but the amount line breaks we make through Lockyer is rediculous(to the points where he leads line break assists). If you put Shaun Berrigan outside any playmaker other than Johns or Lockyer he'd barely have half a dozen tries.If Scott Prince, Craig Gower, Brent Sherwin, etc. were the main playmakers in the Broncos team instead of Lockyer then they would still be on top of the table.
Whether you like it or not, Lockyer has already sealed himself as a great fullback, and if he gains some consistency and finally takes his club and international form to Origin level, he will be remembered as a great (attackingNone of them are great players, but they are all good players. That's all Lockyer is. A good player.
Ghoulies said:Whether you like it or not, Lockyer has already sealed himself as a great fullback, and if he gains some consistency and finally takes his club and international form to Origin level, he will be remembered as a great (attacking) five-eighth.![]()
Johns Magic said:Yes, he's a champion fullback. But he's got a long way to go to be considered a champion 5/8.