The bloke tries his guts out for the full 80min (when he gets 80min) and coaches love that type of player in their sides. Does this make him a good rep player? Maybe not but when the chips are down you know that he is not going to give up, which is more than can be said for alot of "superstars" in our game who switch off when the going gets tough.
This is a representative side, the best in the game are chosen for this team.
Trying your guts out, while being a great attribute, does not equal talent.
Gidley's not good enough.
Hunt (going to AFL)
Bowen (past it an injured)
Patten (imo a great club man but lacks real spark)
Campbell (past it rep wise)
Dugan (certainly has promise but is still green NRL-wise let alone at rep level)
Boyd (Still learning the fullback trade and lacks creativity)
JW, take off the blue and red blinkers will you, come on now.
The only players Gidley could be better than in that list are mayb Boyd and Dugan.
You can't say past it repwise, because we're comparing playing ability, in which Gidley has nothing on Campbell, or Patten and yes Bowen's injured but even then Bowen still has superior talent.
Gidley goes fantastic for Newcastle because the side is structured around the way he plays, which really doesn't fit into any sort of position.
It's almost a hooker/fullback hybrid.
As a result it's of no wonder that when he's used in representative teams, where all players are experts in their positions, that he falls behind and creates more problems than solutions.
I love Gidley, he has a great work ethic but he doesn't bring anything to representative level because he doesn't fit in anywhere.
Perhaps if his playing style changes this might be up for interpretation.