Havnt seen the conference, but he blasted CA apparently and is playing on.
Katich hits out over 'ridiculous' axing
Updated June 10, 2011 12:19:00
Dumped Australian opener Simon Katich has hit out over his omission from Cricket Australia's list of contracted players, labelling it 'absolutely ridiculous'.
The 35-year-old, one of Australia's most consistent performers over past seasons, was told by chairman of selectors Andrew Hilditch on Tuesday that he had been axed so the Test team could focus on bedding down a new opening partnership.
A fuming Katich, who averages 45.03 from 56 Tests, said he was "disappointed and frustrated" by what he felt were "inconsistent selection policies" coming out of Cricket Australia.
"I also want to make it clear that I know I'm not the only player that's gone through this in the last couple of years due to inconsistent selection policies," he told a press conference at the Sydney Cricket Ground.
"I just hope that something good comes out of this situation, because I actually think the decision that came on Tuesday was absolutely ridiculous."
Katich had no doubt his age was a determining factor.
"I've got a massive feeling that my age played a big part in it," he said.
"Look, obviously that's never going to be mentioned because of the legalities of it all.
"But I know that in my last three seasons I've got the numbers on the board, I've enjoyed playing in the team, and to be told that it was because the opening partnership needed to be bedded down before the 2013 Ashes just doesn't sit well with me."
Katich said inconsistency and indecision was a concerning trend in Cricket Australia selection policy.
"The facts are, a week or two before the Ashes, a squad of 17 was named," he said.
"Now in my opinion, if you can't know what your best XI is a week or so before our biggest Test series that we play in, the Ashes, then that to me reeks of indecision.
"The fact that we've had 10 or 11 different spinners in the last two years or three years or whatever it's been - obviously some have been through retirements and injury and stuff like that - but that to me is another indicator of the inconsistency in selections.
"There's been rules for some and rules for others."
Katich confirmed he had pondered retirement but opted to play on for New South Wales out of respect for his team-mates, and said he had not completely ruled out a return to the international arena.
The gritty left-hander had formed a successful opening partnership with Shane Watson, but an Achilles tendon injury suffered during the second Adelaide Test against England forced him to miss the remainder of the Ashes series, won 3-1 by the tourists.
"To be given the reason that it's because the opening partnership needs to be down for 2013, when I know for a fact that Watto and I have thoroughly enjoyed opening together and it's been one of the bright spots in our team the last two years - I find it very hard to believe that," Katich said.
"The system at the moment - it's not only just affecting me - but it's also affected a number of players.
"I'm just one of a number of players in Australian cricket over the last number of years that has had to go through this process."
Katich said he had given his opinion on a review into Australian cricket which was opened following the Ashes debacle, but was not allowed to reveal specific details.
But he left no doubt as to his current thoughts on Cricket Australia.
"I know how they operate and I could see it coming," he said.
"I've only had a four-minute conversation with Andrew Hilditch on Tuesday and I haven't heard from anyone else at Cricket Australia since, and I've been involved with the organisation since 1999."
Pay peanuts, you get monkeys: Katich
Malcolm Conn
From: AdelaideNow
June 10, 2011 12:00PM
Former Australian cricket legend Bob Simpson shakes the hand of Simon Katich after he today held a press conference at the SCG speaking about his sacking as a contracted Cricket Australia player. Picture: Phil Hillyard Source: The Daily Telegraph
SIMON Katich has denied that his dressing room tiff with recently appointed captain Michael Clarke two and a half years ago had any bearing on his sacking.
"I dont think that was an issue,'' Katich said during a damning critique of Australian cricket yesterday. "We had a professional relationship.''
Katich announced he will continue to play for NSW out of respect for the state's cricketers and administrators but admits that at 35 his international career is over.
Three days after being sacked from Australia's list of 25 contracted players Katich, confirmed he had explored legal action for wrongful dismal.
Asked about three part-time selectors on the four-man panel, including chairman Andrew Hilditch, Katich replied: "If you pay peanuts you get monkeys.''
Former Australian captain and coach Bob Simpson, who helped resurrect Katich's career, was at his packed press conference to offer support. Simpson is Hilditch's father-in-law.
Selectors earning as little as $40,000 who combine their duties with full-time jobs are deciding the future of players earning up to $2 million.
Hilditch told Katich he had been dumped during a four-minute phone conversation on Tuesday.
"I'm extremely frustrated and disappointed with the decision,'' Katich said.
"I also want to make it clear that I am not the only player who has gone through this over the last couple of years due to an inconsistent selection policy.
"I just hope that something good comes out of this situation because I thought the decision was absolutely ridiculous.''
The problem is that the whim of these selectors is massively inconsistent and stupid. Now that they are not winning in the test format they are shunning players who only perform in that arena when tests ought to be what really matter. Oh and the 2013 excuse:lol:, Australia will play South Africa , Sri Lanka and India all of whom are top test sides later THIS year, I don't see how playing England in a few years time takes precedence over that today and if it does why weren't the other 35s sacked too?
Probably been building for a while, eg getting dumped after scoring about 200 runs for the match against India then tour century, for Andrew symonds of all people, regularly being the fall guy for a side. And really, probably never feeling secure in the side despite how good his form had been, justified by a few bad tests when carrying serious injuries and thats it, career over, whilst Hussey, pre ashes, was averaging something like 34 over his previous 35 tests (including a ton in a match the opposition threw), Pontings been in woeful form for some time, his replacement averaged just 16 in the tests after Kats injury.All 100% correct as we've all blathered on about for several years.
Still coming from a guy who just got the axe it reeks of sour grapes. The selection panel has been a rotten farce for years. Coming out and saying it only after you fall victim to it doesn't really rate with me. Was he as candid when interviewed for the review? If so great, no need to take it outside of that process unless at the end of it nothing changes. If he didn't then he should suck it up and get out there and smash Shield attacks to all corners. I'm sure there are plenty of players who also reckon they copped a raw deal and some may even have more of a case, but they didn't hold a press conference to whinge about it.
I was under the impression that he wasn't taking legal action and he was complaining that there is no internal avenue to appeal and the only thing left for players in that situation is to take legal action. Which is a fir complaint, I would think. Will he be taking legal actions?