I gave Kingston points too...I fail to see what that has to do with anything...As for Burt, I was of the opinion that Hayne was not in good enough form to oust him, and that his best position is fullback. That changed a few weeks ago when Hayne had a cracker at centre. Again, relevance? Zero.
Keating is a good young (22 year old) hooker who is developing his game. He makes mistakes...so f**king what? He also does some very good things and is improving. He will be a top notch hooker. Kingston had a good game...but is a 26 year old who is still yet to cement a first grade spot after 5 years. There are reasons for that, he's hot and cold for starters and has had issues with his service and vision. I'd compare him to Daniel Irvine; a good player with some good traits, but also some holes in his game. And at 26, he's probably not going to improve very much. Keating is.
Ultimately, Kinga is a good player who has shown he deserves a role in the 17. But he's not better than Keating.
People who pick at the tiniest flaw within a player are an amusing sideshow, but it seems that our supporter base is made up of far too many....it's not as though Keating just offers nothing like a Finch or a Hauraki, and it's not as though he has attidue problems like Hayne or others have in the past. He does a good job and is a young player on the improve...