Defer to the coifed
Bench
- Messages
- 4,499
I thought you said it had him covered? Its irrelevant to his case.
its not far ken hard is it? I love attenborough. But only with the sound down.Don’t get all the outrage over Folau, don’t want to read his sermons don’t follow his Instagram account.
If I was running the game every player in the NRL would be entitled to two social media accounts.
Official NRL account - @sharkswadegraham.
Personal account -
@wadegraham
The official NRL account falls under contractual rules and regulations - game content and interaction with supporters. Players can be sacked for inappropriate content from this account
Personal account they can say whatever they want as a private citizen under “Free Speech”. Players cannot be sacked from this account.
Not the whole forum mste... just the usual nut-job stirring the pot.This forum: "Why do the media hate us! We don't deserve this bad press!"
Also this forum: "Hire Israel Folau! What could possibly go wrong?"
I thought you said it had him covered? Its irrelevant to his case.
Don’t get all the outrage over Folau, don’t want to read his sermons don’t follow his Instagram account.
Well I guess we will see how much harmony there is between the NRL Administration and Club administrators.
It will only take one of sixteen to present a contract to the NRL, however if Todd has any influence, this will not happen, Falou will be made zero offers from NRL clubs. No litigation required, no controversy, just no offers.
I hope not to be that club, not a Falou thing, do bite the hand that feeds you thing.
I hope all clubs can see, simply not worth it.
This is where we may disagree, there are clubs that can “get away” and clubs that “can’t get away” with signing Folau.
The NRL would allow Folau to sign with Brisbane, Souths, Melbourne or Roosters in my opinion. I also believe that the NRL would support these clubs to make sure it does work.
As for the remaining clubs, the outrage would be based on a sliding scale depending which club it was that signed him.
Time will tell I guess.This is where we may disagree, there are clubs that can “get away” and clubs that “can’t get away” with signing Folau.
The NRL would allow Folau to sign with Brisbane, Souths, Melbourne or Roosters in my opinion. I also believe that the NRL would support these clubs to make sure it does work.
As for the remaining clubs, the outrage would be based on a sliding scale depending which club it was that signed him.
It could not have gone to a NSW court. The State legislation has nothing to do with Folaus case. Its an open & shut case of unfair dismissal based upon Religous vilification. Federal.Covered if he took it to court in NSW. His brief would have known that and hence into Federal Court instead.